The Mystery of Mary Magdalene Continued

As a consequence of having watched the documentary based on Mary Magdalene I felt it necessary to try to seek more information as an affirmation. It wasn’t enough just to be impressed by a series of timely coincidences and so naturally I wanted to find out more. There were questions also from the documentary such as what chances were there of Mary Magdalene having red hair in first century Israel? Of course Magdala which is said to be where Mary is from is a trading port with the accompanying conditions of people from far off lands coming and going,  so could it be this influence on Mary’s Genes in a population which is predominantly dark haired? The Documentary talks about Mary fleeing to Southern France and teaching there from a cave for 30 years. If so would there not be any manuscripts of such activity? Also the skull purported to be Mary’s have no teeth, unfortunately because modern forensic technology would have been able to discover where the owner of the skull had resided in early life. It is quite possible that the teeth are missing because of the value that pilgrims had put on relics and as such may have been removed for that reason, but it does not help us in this day and age where real tangible information is sought.

The first source to go to was the writings of the True Gospel Revealed Anew by Jesus. And as far as I was able to ascertain there was no mention of her whatsoever. However I did come across a blog which was purporting to contain comments from Jesus and Mary Magdalene which came across as a critique of the Padgett writings and some of the comments there were in effect contradictory to what had been explained by Jesus and the Celestial Spirits in the messages received by Padgett. Therefore, although some things were an interesting insight, because all spiritual realms are different and the expression also can be varied , there were key points about the path to salvation which gave the initial impression that the claimed spirits of the said Jesus and Mary Magdalene were impostors.

The link will not be provided in this case because without having read the Padgett writings people will believe some of the contradictory content of this version of the Jesus and Mary comments to be true. Therefore, for myself this is a bit of a stick out the neck, head above the parapet moment which can be dangerous because of the responsibility inherently attached to making a such a comment.

Quote from the blog: Mary Magdalene and Jesus’ Comments on the Padgett Messages.

[Quote] Mary and Jesus, It’s been playing on my mind for some time, so I feel, somewhat reluctantly and feeling very daunted by the task, to write your comments on the Padgett messages – that of course is assuming that you would like to give them.
My reluctance at undertaking such a task is that there are a lot of messages, of which I have little interest in, having already written much about them with you both, so going back over with what you’ve both said does not thrill me too much. However having expressed a little of my negative feeling about it, I also feel that it is a valuable piece of work, helping to bridge the Padgett messages with my work, something that I feel needs to be done so as not to have them as this separate thing which people can become fixated on believing that all one needs is the Padgett messages to advance ones soul- which is untrue.
So I will act on my feelings and begin. As to whether or not I complete the task, time will tell, and if I do, it will be because sufficient inspiration and feeling has been present to do so.
I also assume that if you agree on doing it, then it wont be an imposition on you and you wont mind if I look at it as something of a long term project, to do when I have other subjects I’d prefer to write about. [Unquote]

SO WE ALREADY HAVE A MINDSET WHICH IS GOING TO HAVE A DERIMENTAL INFLUENCE ON THE QUALITY AND EFFICACY OF THE MESSAGES BEING RECEIVED.

James Padgett was especially selected for the work of receiving Divine messages, as expressed by Jesus and the Celestial Spirits in his writings and much time had care had been taken to look for another after the efforts of Emanuel Swedenborg who was the first attempt but failed in the ability to receive the purity of message because of his own religious concepts which he held on to. Also Swedenborg was able to travel into the various levels of the Spirit World to report on his experience but this ability was not required again, although it has been expressed that much of what Swedenborg conveyed of his experiences are true.

Straight away while reading the said blog I had noticed statements which are at odds with the Padgett writings whom I naturally give great credibility to, and also a question and answer session with ”Jesus and Mary” on the Book of Revelation when it has already been called an allegory which was not even written by those accredited to have done but by the imaginations of scribes many years later, also adds an additional question mark against it.

Also at this point there was no information about Mary herself which was what was being sought. Additionally there could be a situation where the full content of Padgett’s writings were not read fully, which is understandable because there is so much content, or even not fully understood as intended, likely because they contain very deep concepts of truth which no mortal could ever have formulated, or that the person has their own deeply entrenched beliefs. The Padgett writings are very precisely written with good straight forward language.

Despite having expressed the above, I believe that the person writing these messages is sincere for the best motive, although there is a sense of superiority over Padgett and his own abilities but when he says ” it will be because sufficient inspiration and feeling has been present to do so.”it is a true reflection of how things work.

There are certain paragraphs within the blog which explain things which are true, as Jesus in the Padgett writings has expressed, and and this relates to the fact that He himself understands more now than he ever did while on Earth. So also Mary is saying that there is more to know than Padgett has written, and Jesus has also said that there will be others also who will be called to write more of the truths in the future.

All of the above, although written now, this morning, was spotted four days ago on 14th February but it was this morning that I made a further search and came across the writings from the same author, which I hadn’t expected, which contain communication with Mary Magdalen about herself,  which was what was wanted to begin with, and the relationship with Jesus which looks credible.

So had to reflect that it may be a mistake to dismiss it on the basis of the first impression, which still remains true in my opinion. Things are so convoluted, but first of all would like to show something by a person who has approached the question of the identity of Mary Magdalen on a purely academic level and displays much reasonable thought.

Who Was Mary Magdalene?
http://margmowczko.com/mary-the-magdalene/

Also there is content which was contained in the TV documentary, and I have seen this approach before where a TV documentary has been based upon the writings and research of others in the public domain.
http://www.gospel-mysteries.net/mary-magdalene.html

Here below, we can see a very different attitude of the author in his introduction pertaining to answers sought to questions from Mary Magdalene who is in spirit. Start from the beginning: Jesus and Mary are Soulmates. http://withmarymagdaleneandjesus.weebly.com/uploads/1/1/2/2/1122832/mj_blog_bk_1_posted.pdf

Originally saw the post below posted by Milos Dunaj on the Gospel of Mary Magdalene Facebook page shortly after it was posted, but on Tuesday 13th February I decided to take a look again and while doing so made a comment. The following morning on Wednesday 14th I tuned into a TV program that was halfway though called The Real Mary Magdalene. Because the program seemed so coincidental related to the previous day’s comment I thought to make the program known but because I had to rush out to catch a particular bus which only runs once an hour I had to rush out to catch it.
To my great surprise, at the end of the communal green which was only a short distance away at 90% to my own road was parked a solitary van which had Magdalene advertised on the side and took it to be an affirmation of what had been said. It was staring me square in the face as I rounded the corner, but usually I just walk diagonally across the green. I had initially walked past, but the symbolism wasn’t lost on me so I walked back the short distance to take a quick photograph which is provided with the time taken information on a screen shot.

It had crossed my mind that perhaps the van was always parked there but hadn’t noticed in which case there was no meaning attached to it at all and when I returned about 5 hours later it was still there so that seemed to seal the idea and decided not to mention it.

Today when I looked across there was a much larger white van parked in the same place so I went over to inquire to the chap who turned out to be Romanian, who had been living in Spain for 15 years, cleaning the side windows and he said that it is normally parked there but hasn’t been seen today which is unusual. There is still no sign of it.

The remaining part of the program that I saw was focused on Mary having fled to the South of France to escape the persecution of the early Christians.

Also I tend to feel that the reputation of Mary Magdalene being a reformed prostitute was an act of malignment by a male dominated society and this reputation is now being seen as representing hope for everyone, as being a reformed woman and as such is also being used as a figurehead for the feminist movement.

The transmutation seems to be headed further than this because it is now being suggested that Mary was the real messiah and that Jesus was the front man which is complete nonsense.

It would however be reasonable to believe that Mary was in fact the Soulmate of Jesus and that like Jesus she would most likely have received the removal of encrustations from her soul through Divine Love while in the womb of her mother, just as Jesus had explained the process for himself.

Here is a link to an explanation found just this evening which is very insightful. I feel that the author has a very good grasp of ideas although with regards to the Davinci Code novel, I have never regarded it with any seriousness. Also reincarnation is a flawed concept with no reality in practice although it is true that we pre exist with our Soulmate and incarnate at the time of our birth. Both the male and female entity do so, it is said, at the same time but in different geographical locations, as would be the case of Mary and Jesus.
https://www.near-death.com/reincarnation/history/gospel-of-mary.html

From Facebook page of Gospel of Mary Magdalene:

Milos Dunaj
7 February at 19:19
Mary was born in the village called Magdal in province Galilea. She was priest in community called Nazareas. She wear red clothes like all women priest in a community. This community lived similar to today’s tantra communities, for joy and wisdom. The first baby she had with John Baptist, a cousin of Jesus. But it was difficult to stay with John. He spent a lot of time in desert. Another 3 children she had together with Jesus. He was rabbi, and for rabbi was not possible to be no-married. After his (not) death they left Holly Land like an immigrants.

Robert Hole It is quite possible that what you have presented is correct and may give an insight into the question from the Disciples why Jesus loved Mary more than them and why Jesus kissed her on the lips. Before joining the Gnostic groups it had crossed my mind that there is never any mention of Jesus having a spouse and yet we are constantly reminded about this relationship for others particularly soulmates and is one of the blessings from God so why not the same for Jesus, When I first read the account of the Disciples asking why Jesus loved Mary more than them, then I understood this in this context and that Mary would have been of the calibre of character and understanding to be suitable for Jesus and this is born out that she was also involved with John the Baptist, as now mentioned, who was also a Holy man.
Manage
Like
· Reply · 2d

Robert Hole replied to Milos Dunaj’s comment.
13 February 2018 20:54
It is quite possible that what you have presented is correct and may give an insight into the question from the Disciples why Jesus loved Mary more than them and why Jesus kissed her on the lips. Before joining the Gnostic groups it had crossed my mind that there is never any mention of Jesus having a spouse and yet we are constantly reminded about this relationship for others particularly soulmates and is one of the blessings from God so why not the same for Jesus, When I first read the account of the Disciples asking why Jesus loved Mary more than them, then I understood this in this context and that Mary would have been of the calibre of character and understanding to be suitable for Jesus and this is born out that she was also involved with John the Baptist, as now mentioned, who was also a Holy man.

Robert Hole A program just finished on TV Yesterday Channel called Forbidden History about Mary Magdalene , called The Real Mary Magdalene, hosted by Jamie Therston. The program was already halfway through when I came across it.

The program confirms strongly that Mary was the spouse of Jesus but people interviewed say that she is a reformed prostitute, but I don’t believe that she was at all. Also that she may have been the real Messiah and that Jesus was her front man, This I believe is nonsense. I don’t have time to write more but will do so later.
Manage
Like
· Reply · 1d

Robert Hole commented on Milos Dunaj’s post.
14 February 2018 12:29
A program just finished on TV Yesterday Channel called Forbidden History about Mary Magdalene , called The Real Mary Magdalene, hosted by Jamie Therston. The program was already halfway through when I came across it.

The program confirms strongly that Mary was the spouse of Jesus but people interviewed say that she is a reformed prostitute, but I don’t believe that she was at all. Also that she may have been the real Messiah and that Jesus was her front man, This I believe is nonsense. I don’t have time to write more but will do so later.

Interesting also is that Carla Young had joined the Gospel of Mary Magdalene Facebook page the same day and one of her first posts was this:

Carla Young shared a link.
14 February at 13:39 · Pulaski, AR, United States
I find it probable, that Mary’s reputation was intentionally blemished to take her Holy Power as High Priestess away from her and to corrupt the public opinions of her and thus allow unjust men, to gain power and control of the church.

The van disappeared the following day and did not return until Saturday evening.