The Curiosity of The Re-emergence of SMOLENSK at a None Anniversary Time
In Poland there is a cloud of suspicion over Tusk because not only was he not on the aircraft that was brought down in Smolensk, but it is also felt that he did not do enough to secure a thorough investigation and as such is felt to have committed treason.
There are questions about how a low flying aircraft over trees could break up the way that it did and about the lack of survivors. It has been suggested that there was a bomb on board and if so there must be a further question to how it was activated at the precise place armed actors lay in wait to murder any survivors.
A previous contributor to the original UK Column forum, Bluthund, before it unexpectedly ceased operation without warning or explanation in the summer of 2011 put forward the theory by his father that the shock wave from an external explosive device would be enough to break up an aircraft and also added the suggestion that the assailants could have hailed from the EU. That was said in 2010.
It is known that the people who represented the Polish government at that time were strongly independent and did not take kindly to the dominance of the EU and just like Britain has kept hold of their own currency, the Zlotty and as a result Poland has been able to become prosperous and increase the well being of it’s population, that is why many Poles of the first migration 2004 have returned.
[Quote] On 10 April 2010, a Tupolev Tu-154 aircraft of the Polish Air Force crashed near the city of Smolensk, Russia, killing all 96 people on board. Among the victims were the President of Poland Lech Kaczyński and his wife Maria, the former President of Poland in exileRyszard Kaczorowski, the chief of the Polish General Staff and other senior Polish military officers, the president of the National Bank of Poland, Polish Government officials, 18 members of the Polish Parliament, senior members of the Polish clergy and relatives of victims of the Katyn massacre. The group was arriving from Warsaw to attend an event commemorating the 70th anniversary of the massacre, which took place not far from Smolensk. [Unquote]
Here is an analysis video translated with English subtitles telling of the conversation of the persons awaiting to finish off any survivors. Although the opening box overlay says what it does. I have a different viewpoint on it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54IxJfPxBoU
This video is new and was found just now while deciding to write my take on events:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxC4WiTsreg
Here is a link to an upload of the video soon after but the original was not as blocky as this version. What this version does retain is the gun shot where the video momentarily pauses between the bent bough curved back on itself. At this point a shot could be heard and at the same time an instantaneous disturbance by what appeared to be the result of the blast. In this video though any such effect is obscured by the blockiness of the low bitrate video. The original gunshot blast was something that I had pointed out on the forums at the time and it had appeared afterwards that the video had been doctored to remove the blast effect by perhaps removing a frame or two of the video at that point. Other videos would move quickly past that point.
Having come across the video at the time by chance, I was aware that there wasn’t much news of the accident seemed to be very sparse and it was only in bringing up the subject with a Polish friend and work colleague at our place of work that he showed a more high definition version of the video and said that the person in white who’s arm could be seen moving was a religious minister. Additionally over time it was mentioned that the flight recorders had been retained in Russia despite requests for their return by the Polish government. Also it took much protest to have the bodies returned to Poland and that those that were had body parts missing or were those of others, suggesting that attempts were made to conceal evidence of the cause of death.
Recently, while pursuing research on The EU stance on Brexit the events of the Smolensk aircrash came to mind and I was most curious why Donald Tusk was not on that aircraft, thus initially thinking that he had remained behind in Poland. However the opposite was the case in that it had been reported that he had already been in Russia for two weeks earlier before the day of the air crash, and a different report stated three days .
Now this point is interesting because a news paper report stating that journalists who had only recently arrived in Russia went directly to the crash site and that Donald Tusk was with them. So by implication, without clarification, the impression was that Donald Tusk also had also only just arrived in Russia.
Another Polish internal report made the claim that there was no motorcade waiting at the airport to receive the Polish Government on arrival because it was already known in advance that it would not be required. A differing report pointed out that the aircraft that was transporting the vehicle and which was ahead did not land.
Would it not be necessary for Russia to maintain a constant pretence? So the most obvious question would be where was the whereabouts of Donald Tusk during the immediate expectation of the Polish contingencies arrival? Its an open question.
There has been speculation that it was an explosion on board the aircraft that brought it down and one report claims traces of Nito, then the next obvious question is what are the logistics in activating an explosion on board at the required location, since the assassins must have already been laying in wait to carry out their dirty deed of execution to ensure no survivors.
[Quote] ”in early May, the Polish public learned of yet another startling revelation. According to Poland’s Agency of Internal Security (ABW), someone in the Russian Federation hacked into President Kaczyński’s cellular phone only a few minutes after the crash time (the crash occurred at 10:41 AM Russian time, while the first break-in occurred at 10:46 AM) and checked his voice mail. [unquote]
The Suggestion by Bluthund’s father eight years ago is most likely closer to the truth and Polish investigators have recently carried out experiments to duplicate the same type of damage sustained by the fabric of the aircraft by building a section of fuselage to the same specification and scale, and the type of damage sustained has been duplicated exactly. The results lead to the conclusion that a thermobaric charge was used to bring down the aircraft which causes a shock wave and consequent explosion.
Such a weapon would more accurately be used at a lower flying altitude than at normal cruising height and it seems that this was implemented by fooling the pilot on the location of the landing strip. This appeared to be achieved by placing dummy landing lights in the vicinity of the wooded area. This area would also provide cover for the perpetrators.
[Quote] ”A thermobaric bomb is an unusual type of explosive, that doesn’t incorporate oxygen molecules, thus requiring atmospheric oxygen. Sometimes called fuel-air explosives, the name comes from Greek and literally means “heat” and “pressure.”
The most interesting thing about this bomb is the fact that it actually produces two blasts, the first being the dispersion of a cloud of liquid or powder explosive using a small detonating charge, and then the main explosion, when a second charge ignites the cloud, producing the actual deflagration.
The advantage of this bomb is the fact that it combines the power of both forces, intense heat and huge pressure, to destroy even the most inaccessible targets. It’s not more than a mix of a monopropellant fuel explosive and a highly energetic material, like powdered aluminum.
Being an ideal package of two crushing forces, even on their own, condensed in a tight space, the thermobaric bomb is ideal for blasting underground targets, like army bunkers and missile silos, while at the same time limiting collateral damage.
The intense concentrated fireball combined with devastating blast overpressure destroyed a large one-story masonry type building in Iraq in only one round, coming from a Shoulder-Launched Multipurpose Assault Weapon-Novel Explosion (SMAW-NE), from a distance of 100 yards (91 meters).[unquote]
Testimony of witness:
[Quote] ” Anatoly Zhuyev is another witness of the last seconds of Tupolev’s flight. Zhuyev stood on the road by the garages. From his position he could see the back of the aircraft. According to Zhuyev’s testimony, he saw a huge blast behind the tail of the aircraft that looked like an enormous egg yolk. “When the aircraft emerged for a short time from the fog, there was a moment when the engines roared, and then there was this blinding flash. After the flash the aircraft tried to gain altitude” Zhuyev testified later. The aircraft already flew past the birch tree, flying at the altitude of more than 10 metres above the ground. [Unquote]
2018 is not a time of a significant anniversary but it is a time of significant Russia bashing.
In 2010 there did’t seem to be much coverage by mainstream media at the time and most information was online but now there is MSM activity at this time in March 2018.
Back in 2010 the West was on good terms with Russia and Putin, it was a two way relationship and at one time President Clinton expressed to Tony Blair that Putin is a decent chap and that they could work with him.
[Quote] ”At the end of 2006, Sergey Yastrzhembsky, the special presidential representative for developing relations with the European Union, expressed hope that Russia and Brussels would mend ties. He believed that Germany’s presidency of the European Union in 2007 would facilitate the process.
But the dialogue on the new Russo-EU agreement on partnership and cooperation reached a deadlock due to Poland’s veto, Prokudin and Ardaev highlighted.” [unquote]
There are two differing reports coming out of Poland carried out by those who sincerely seek the truth and those in power who willingly follow the Russian narrative and seek to cover up the truth.
[Quote] ”To begin with, the crash itself seemed quite suspicious. The post-Soviet Russians have been evasive and uncooperative from the outset, assigning blame exclusively on the Polish side throughout. Furthermore, their behavior has exhibited many disturbing signs of an apparent cover-up. The liberal post-communist Polish government, in turn, has consistently and pusillanimously sought to accommodate Russia. For quite a few Poles, the combination of Moscow’s stonewalling and Warsaw’s docility created an unsettling impression of collusion to suppress the truth, not unlike the collaboration between the Soviets and their Polish-speaking vassals to smother the truth about the Katyn Forest massacre. [unquote]
My personal suspicion was that there was an equal hand involved but now that ‘Russia bashing’ is the flavour of the last five years or so then the MSM are now in over drive attempting to blame it exclusively on the Russians. Who knows the inner motives of what took place in Salisbury at this particular time? Only asking.
https://www.iwp.edu/docLib/20120514_Smolensk2YearsLater.pdf
http://www.doomedsoldiers.com/polish-tu-154-crash-russia.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IieGMnTD-QM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3466dPCjAT0
BBC report on five year anniversary.
Anatomy of a Crash Site Co operation not taken
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZ1vgKKpkDM