Paying For Our Own Demise

Paying For Our Own Demise

Just this morning 22nd February 2023, Johnny Mercer was interviewed on LBC, when towards the end he said that Britain is the second biggest contributor to NATO. So obviously America is the largest contributor, so why is Britain paying more than any of the EU countries when the war in Ukraine is on the European mainland and the EU has stitched us up over Brexit. We have suffered under austerity since 2008 where key workers have seen an effective drop in their wages of 26%, and that is before this present raft of inflation, which in reality is equal to that amount in just one year.

This is my take on what I believe has been and still is taking place in Ukraine. It was written in longhand in one sitting just over four months after the invasion by Russia and was the result of the many strands of thought, at that time, which I eventually felt strongly to sit down and write them out.

Sometime last year I expressed on my Facebook page that I would not be posting any political views anymore, at least that was my feeling at the time, and although we always continue to absorb impressions, I have found myself not wishing to spend the time to express those thoughts, with the same vigour that I once had in the past to share them.

There were reports about the West failing to keep to the Minsk Agreements, of which there were two officially signed. Also alongside this were numerous Russian diplomatic complaints drawing attention to this fact, all of which seemed to draw no interest or comment when I posted them.

Since that time it has more recently, been revealed by the media that there has been an admittance that the Minsk agreements were nothing more than a ruse which meant that America,UK and the EU had come together to sign those documents in a cynical misuse of trust to buy time, time in order to prepare for war against Russia. There may have been a sincere intent by individuals but what may not have been taken into account is the concept of compartmentalisation. The first seeds of this concept were first germinated during David Cameron’s decision making during the Coalition which brought about the question about who has given him the authority for such actions, but had not been developed, it was just an observation at that time. I am more convinced now that we should not be thinking in terms of the often derided conspiracy theory, but rather towards the process of controlled Compartmentalisation which means that only those that need to know are made aware. You could say that this is a similar process to the manufacture of top secret components far and wide where nobody is aware of what they are really making except the designers and those who finally assemble them.

Comments within brackets were added at the time of typing out the  written content on 25th January 2023 

Written by hand 30th June 2022.

This is not to condone the invasion of Ukraine, much the same as it was a sad day when NATO voted for war in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria.

The most surprising thing is the measure of tolerance that Russia’s ruling party had displayed during the eight years that ethnic Russians have endured persecution in the Ukraine since the putsch of 2014, as well as the military attacks by the Azov Battalions on the civilians in the villages of the Donbas, totally ignoring both Minsk Agreements.

The motto of NATO which we are constantly reminded of by the media is: ”An attack on one is an attack on all”. Why shouldn’t this apply equally to Russia? It has basically become a World War by proxy against Russia, at the moment confined within Ukraine.

I believe that the present situation in the Ukraine is the result of entrapment and the actions of agents provocateurs going back prior to 2014 to create the environment for ‘revolution’ similar to Colour Revolutions beginning in 2011. Syria can be included in this.

The ”Seven Countries in Five Years” as testified by Wesley Clark indicates this.

What is happening now, instead of negotiating for peace, something that Zelensky has been urged not to do by the UK, is that military resources are being sent to the Ukraine from other NATO Countries only to be quickly destroyed along with the lives of the most capable.

Although Finland was neutral it has a large standing army and is well equipped, but is being coaxed into joining NATO which will result in yet another country from the alliance sitting on Russia’s border. This of course is like a red rag to a Bull.

I believe that the tactic has been, all along, to destroy the balance of power in the World, and Russia has been seen to be the greatest obstacle to this plan.

Britain along with America have been co instigators in all of this. This is to do with the leadership who obey direction from a compartmentalised source.1

(1)(Recent thoughts about this concept is that we can move aside from the idea of conspiracy theory and think more towards the idea of compartmentalisation where others who are contributing to the overall plan only know what their instruction is and nothing about what others are doing. This concept can also work between countries who themselves may be being used in a similar way. Russia and China for example, against the West, and finally China against Russia. However we cannot really know in advance the road that will ultimately lead to a Totalitarian World. 25th Jan 2023).

Such an example would be Liz Trus who when asked about supplying weapons to Taiwan was tongue tied because she hadn’t received her script. That is why,I believe the Johnson administration seems to be surrounded by duffers.

Returning to the first train of thought, India already has a natural trading relationship with Russia, and it had become evident that America attempted to bully India into breaking those ties which they refused to do. (much the same as they did with the German trading relationship with Russia during the very first round of sanctions imposed on Russia as a result of the Novochock incident in Salisbury, the same Novichock that a minister had advised the public could be safely wiped clean with Baby Wipes.) . I must say that for years, news from India was always the place to go to for a balanced view along with RT which has now been taken off of the air.

Finland has been goaded into joining NATO believing that Russia has expansionist aims, and to reinforce this view, 1937 and Hitler is brought into prominence. However what is taking place in the Ukraine is reminiscent of the Spanish Civil War.

I am of the opinion that Russia’s sole aim in the Ukraine was to go to the aid of Russians in the Donbas who have been constantly under attack for eight years, and that finally Russia stepped in to help, something that is no different from what NATO proclaims its purpose is for.

Finland had been doing the correct thing by remaining neutral, but building up its own military forces solely for its own defense should it ever become required. In a sense it is also an independent Country which has the potential to stand against the tyranny of the globalists, so instead of attacking it directly, it becomes invited to NATO where it will lose its own decision making, and at the same time help towards fighting the globalist’s main obstacle to power as well as diminish its own resources in manpower, munitions and machinery. Two birds with one stone.

Britain has been an instigator, along with the US but at the same time has become militarily debilitated, and even now there are no plans to militarily restock. This seems to be following the pattern, citing ”The Peace Dividend” which began with the fall of Communism followed from John Major, through to Tony Blair, David Cameron and now Boris Johnson.

All of those mentioned, except Boris Johnson, were pro EU, though Johnson wrote two papers, one for and another against being a member of the EU. My feeling about this is that he wanted to cover all bases so that no matter what the outcome of the EU Referendum he would still be in control of this part of the plan.

(2), ( We must remember that when Boris Johnson was Foreign Secretary under Teresa May, he was keen to support the friendly terrorists in Syria, along with the White Helmets whom many regard as the fake first responder who only seemed to be interested in treating ISIS casualties, and always seemed to be readily at hand to stretcher away execution victims. Remember that prior to this time he stepped back from being in the running to be voted PM by his party when Teresa May stepped in. but when he eventually became Prime Minister he gave full support to Ukraine despite the already known reputation of the Azov Battalions as previously reported by the BBC, and even now that he has been deposed as Prime Minister he still goes out of his way to continue his influence there instead of focusing on his constituency at home.)

The only explanation that I can find for diminishing the UK’s military capability,as well as its independent industrial capability as dictated by the EU plan for Regions, is to prevent Britain from ever being capable of stepping in once more to stand against tyranny as it did during the First and Second World Wars.

Very cleverly, Britain does not have an armed population, as does a Country like Switzerland, and even sporting guns were made unavailable to the general population after the Dunblain Massacre, an event still shrouded in many unanswered political questions. (Now at this time Illegal guns are finding their way into the UK via illegal immigrants. They are housed at great expense through long ten year contracts awarded to a variety of providers).

Paying for our own demise has been a concept which has been in mind for many years. This means using tax payers money for the purpose of funding projects designed to ensure the collapse of the Country as well as its ability to resist tyranny, ( locally as well as World wide nowadays.) There are many things that can be said about this category related to the practices imposed on the Nation during Covid 19 lock downs, contrasted by Party Gate plus the diverse indoctrination of children.

(3), (Now it is evidenced that the powers that be in the UK are slowly constructing the component parts to enable that same tyranny. We saw elements of it’s practice over the World wide conflation of rules during the Covid 19 period.)

(4), (It is no surprise that our own politicians in the UK religiously complied with every EU diktat even if the result was against the National Interest. They would comply more closely than any of the Continental based EU members ever did, who have a more pragmatic outlook in favour of their own interests. Also most, if not all, of our essential and strategic services are foreign owned. Curious how a foreign power can own these important assets but not our own government, which in turn would belong to the people. During the New Labour years, interestingly enough, there were constant (first hand) reports of aero industry mechanics being made redundant, people who had been fully trained in our own specially fitted out Technical Colleges. Many Polytechnics have been turned into Universities, as well as apprenticeships being relegated to cheap labour by­ unscrupulous employers. Sajid Javid studied in what was once Filton Technical college that served Roll Royce Aero Engines and the British Aircraft Corporation in Filton to train their apprentices.)

On Ditching Brexit

RGH: There have been reports this morning of a secret meeting recently held at Ditchley Park to discuss the future of Brexit. Perhaps a new verb has been created because maybe they wish to ditch Brexit gently by stealth. The theme was how to improve relations with the EU rather than combating their retaliations against us for daring to leave. Wonder if they also discussed 15 minute zones that are underway in Oxford?

Q: We must resist all attempts to rejoin the EU

RGH: Everything was fine until the Maastrict Treaty when the EEC was transformed into a Political entity. However it has been said that had always been the intention, well known by Europeans but kept secret from us which means that the population had been deceived into it. Mrs Thatcher didn’t want it, that is why the Conservative Party got rid of her.

Q: Has Brexit benefited Great Britain?

RGH: Brexit has never been executed properly and the UK accepts all of the tariffs and red tape imposed upon us by the EU which Britain does not impose in return. This means that the difficulties that we are experiencing are due to a deliberate construct. Also those who are happy to accept this situation in government have also introduced policies which are against the interests of existing businesses as well as being unfavourable to investment from abroad and even expansion of already existing companies here.

It seems that the powers that be deem that it is time to pass the batten from the Conservatives to Labour where the Blairites are still imposing their influence and where Keir Starmer has recently declared his preference to the World Economic Forum over Parliament.
No matter who we choose to vote for out of Conservative or Labour, in this two party system, we are doomed either way.
I have been a natural Conservative all my life, but for several years now I have chosen to vote for the Reform Party, when on the ballot sheet, and will continue to do so until the time that they may allow themselves to be influenced by the Friends of Israel who are already embedded within both Labour and the Conservatives.

An example of poor government policy brought to our attention by UK Column News in a piece which begins at 55;48

Screenshot From UK Column News 15th February 2023

https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/uk-column-news-15th-february-2023 

Politico Admin Comment: The result of the vote for Brexit was a surprise for the British establishment, the EU and Cameron himself. They believed that the British people were apathetic and would not vote in its favour. The turn out for the vote was even better than for a General Election. The result should been implemented immediately without any faffing around similar to a Parliamentary election. But they started to postpone it to find a way to “ditch it stealthily”.

Many controversies surrounded voting in Parliament as well as Judicial Reviews by those who were not happy with the Brexit result.

Labour had once been an efficient opposing voice, which is a sign of a healthy democracy, but this seemed to have changed since Tony Blair became the leader of what was to become known as New Labour. Spin was to become its most talked about hallmark.

Tony Blair’s landslide victory in 1997 was even supported by Rupert Murdoch, a staunch globalist, who had always previously been an opponent of Labour. This endorsement could be an indicator of where true allegiances lay. Now in the present time it had been clear for all to see that Labour’s commitment to Brexit was ambiguous so could not be trusted.