RGH: There have been reports this morning of a secret meeting recently held at Ditchley Park to discuss the future of Brexit. Perhaps a new verb has been created because maybe they wish to ditch Brexit gently by stealth. The theme was how to improve relations with the EU rather than combating their retaliations against us for daring to leave. Wonder if they also discussed 15 minute zones that are underway in Oxford?
Q: We must resist all attempts to rejoin the EU
RGH: Everything was fine until the Maastrict Treaty when the EEC was transformed into a Political entity. However it has been said that had always been the intention, well known by Europeans but kept secret from us which means that the population had been deceived into it. Mrs Thatcher didn’t want it, that is why the Conservative Party got rid of her.
Q: Has Brexit benefited Great Britain?
RGH: Brexit has never been executed properly and the UK accepts all of the tariffs and red tape imposed upon us by the EU which Britain does not impose in return. This means that the difficulties that we are experiencing are due to a deliberate construct. Also those who are happy to accept this situation in government have also introduced policies which are against the interests of existing businesses as well as being unfavourable to investment from abroad and even expansion of already existing companies here.
An example of poor government policy brought to our attention by UK Column News in a piece which begins at 55;48
https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/uk-column-news-15th-february-2023
Politico Admin Comment: The result of the vote for Brexit was a surprise for the British establishment, the EU and Cameron himself. They believed that the British people were apathetic and would not vote in its favour. The turn out for the vote was even better than for a General Election. The result should been implemented immediately without any faffing around similar to a Parliamentary election. But they started to postpone it to find a way to “ditch it stealthily”.
Many controversies surrounded voting in Parliament as well as Judicial Reviews by those who were not happy with the Brexit result.
Labour had once been an efficient opposing voice, which is a sign of a healthy democracy, but this seemed to have changed since Tony Blair became the leader of what was to become known as New Labour. Spin was to become its most talked about hallmark.
Tony Blair’s landslide victory in 1997 was even supported by Rupert Murdoch, a staunch globalist, who had always previously been an opponent of Labour. This endorsement could be an indicator of where true allegiances lay. Now in the present time it had been clear for all to see that Labour’s commitment to Brexit was ambiguous so could not be trusted.