This question came to mind yesterday morning but then I became distracted with something perhaps more important but now again this afternoon on arrival home with the intent of listening to some music to relax the question posed itself again. The search question was: Zionism and Godless ideology.

The reason for this question lies in the fact that on Monday 14th May the very moment that I awoke I turned on the radio early in the morning a program was already underway talking about the American recognition that Jerusalem is the capital of the Jewish Homeland and the opening of the American Embassy there on the very day of the 70th Anniversary of the establishment of the so called State of Israel.

This news brought an immediate recollection that during the early 1970s onwards the founder of the
Unification Church, Rev Sun Myung Moon consistently proclaimed that the atheistic ideology of Communism would decline after seventy years, and additionally during the mid 1980s warned that conflict with the Muslim world would be the next World problem after the fall of communism. From current observation, it seems that this has been artificially created and promoted.

Now there is a significance here because in the same way that the recent 100 years anniversary of the birth of Communism last year evoked a feeling that there was an intertwined connection with the Bolshevik Revolution and the steps initiated to bring about the Balfour Declaration which took place roughly within the same time scale, so this time also there seemed to be a significance with the number 70, although there has been a shifting of the time period. 1917 to 1989 for Communism and 1948 to 2018. We cant know if this agenda was on the cards regardless of who had been elected American President in November 2016.

Wall Street financed the sealed train that took Lenin through to Petrograd Russia and it was the same bankers and interests who financed Hitler, so there has always been a question mark over what seemed to be the fact that these very bankers facilitated the extermination of the Jews in Europe. Could it have been the case that Atheistic Zionists were financing the genocide of Jews of faith. It would be awful to think that this was actually part of the overall plan to gain World sympathy for the establishment of the ”Jewish” Homeland but it has since been utilised for this purpose. However here is a video which gives some clarity on the matter:
Benjamin H Freedman’s 1961 Speech at the Willard Hotel
Benjamin.H.Freedman 1961 speech, Extended Version HD Watch through but at 55 minutes there is an explanation of the origin of the word Jew, a name evolved from the geographic location called Judea.

Distinguishing between atheist Zionism and Judaism

Go to:
Appendix II THE JEWISH-CONSPIRACY THEORY OF THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION

[Quote] There is an extensive literature in English, French, and German reflecting the argument that the Bolshevik Revolution was the result of a “Jewish conspiracy”; more specifically, a conspiracy by Jewish world bankers. Generally, world control is seen as the ultimate objective; the
Bolshevik Revolution was but one phase of a wider program that supposedly reflects an age old religious struggle between Christianity and the “forces of darkness.”

The argument and its variants can be found in the most surprising places and from quitesurprising persons. In February 1920 Winston Churchill wrote an article — rarely cited today —for the London Illustrated Sunday Herald entitled “Zionism Versus Bolshevism.” In this’ article Churchill concluded that it was “particularly important… that the National Jews in every country who are loyal to the land of their adoption should come forward on every occasion . . .and take a prominent part in every measure for combatting the Bolshevik conspiracy.”

Churchill draws a line between “national Jews” and what he calls “international Jews.” He argues that the “international and for the most atheistical Jews” certainly had a “very great” role in the creation of Bolshevism and bringing about the Russian Revolution. He asserts (contrary to fact) that with the exception of Lenin, “the majority” of the leading figures in the revolution were Jewish, and adds (also contrary to fact) that in many cases Jewish interests and Jewish places of worship were excepted by the Bolsheviks from their policies of seizure. Churchill
calls the international Jews a “sinister confederacy” emergent from the persecuted populations of countries where Jews have been persecuted on account of their race. Winston Churchill traces this movement back to Spartacus-Weishaupt, throws his literary net around Trotsky, Bela Kun, Rosa Luxemburg, and Emma Goldman, and charges: “This world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing.” [unquote]
http://solargeneral.org/wp-content/uploads/library/wall-street-and-the-bolshevik-revolution-antony-c-sutton.pdf

The Opening Ceremony of the US Embassy in Jerusalem Monday 14th May 2018
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjmwYCu9TRo

We may not agree with the North Korean System of Government,but it is clear to see that their desire to develop a nuclear defence system could be spurred on by the Western goal of constantly invading and overthrowing Middle Eastern governments who may choose their own independent rout to economic survival.

So it would be reasonable to say that North Korea was mostly concerned with staving off invasion rather than using them as a weapon of unprovoked assault on other countries.

The latest development which the North Koreans will be observing is the Israeli’s ruthless attack on Palestinian children protesting while approaching the ”security” fence, a fence which in fact acts as the confines of a prison for the Palestinians. The Palestinians have been reduced to having to throw stones against their captives who receive millions of dollars a day for ”defence” from America while the Palestinians receive zero.

So the World witnessed this ruthless force by well armed Israeli troops and snipers against virtually unarmed children, save for stones which are totally ineffectual. This evidently is the balance of power that America and the Israelis prefer. Walk quietly with a big stick but be sure to confiscate everybody else’s.
The smile that accompanied the handshake that Gaddafi received when he gave up his weapons of mass destruction program was seemingly equivalent to the Mafia Kiss.

After Trump’s banter about who has the biggest nuclear button, things change and Kim Jong-Un had opened himself up to negotiations, obviously believing that he had joined the International club on an equal footing and was looking forward to trade, plus the end of sanctions, with his former enemies but the radical about turn came about when John Bolton put it about that North Korea must unilaterally give up its nukes. This has seemingly taken the relationship back to square one but it will be read that this is just a repetition of past form from the North Koreans regarding the reverting backwards from hope of thawing out of North Korean and the West’s icy relationship.

Returning to Israel, we have witnessed first hand their use of deadly force, even against children, not to forget their involvement with the foment of wars in the Middle East yet they were virtually handed their nuclear weapons on a plate by the very countries who dictate to North Korea and Iran. We know that this could be used as a pretext to attack Iran but when it comes to the Korean Peninsula it is a more delicate matter because of the close proximity to South Korea. It looks like America has slipped up regarding it’s demands.

December 2003: Gaddafi renounces weapons of mass destruction programs.
[Quote]Tony Blair says Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi is willing to join Britain in the fight against terrorism.
After shaking hands with Colonel Gaddafi at the start of the historic talks, the prime minister said there was real hope for a “new relationship”.
People should not forget the past, they should move beyond it, Mr Blair said.
Thursday’s Tripoli meeting follows Libya’s renunciation of weapons of mass destruction in December. Mr Blair said such changes were “extraordinary”.
After the talks took place Mr Blair headed to an EU summit in Brussels set to be dominated by the issue of security in the wake of the Madrid terror attack.
As Mr Blair met Mr Gaddafi, it was announced Anglo-Dutch oil giant Shell had signed a deal worth up to £550m for gas exploration rights off the Libyan coast.[unquote]
Israel’s Nuclear Weapons Program

On Thursday 10th May 2018 I visited a local One Stop Shop to submit an application form sent to me by the Pension Service for a benefit that I am entitled to. The intention was to take it there to confirm if all information was correct against what they already have on record.

The lady at the desk initially did not want to help me and said that I should contact the Pension Service, however she did look into my file on the computer to advise me of specific information that I had been looking for which meant that she actually had my file open on the computer.

When I arrived home I went on Google Earth to locate the Council offices indicated on the return address sheet provided in the envelope by the Pension Service for the delivery by post but I felt that I preferred to deliver it directly by hand. So seeing that it was located in a place that I had visited on other occasions in previous years, I thought that it would be a straightforward drive and that there would be no need to take my Satnav. Big mistake.

To my great surprise the whole site had been turned into a building site for Churchill Retirement Apartments so the next option was to enquire the location of the replacement Offices. The answer came from a passing couple and so made my way to locate it just over 8 miles away. This was a big mistake without the satnav, not so much journeying through the country lanes, but having arrived, because there was no indication of where the offices were and I ventured out and around and returning and having to ask people where the offices were. I must have travelled three times that distance looking. It turned out to be a new £30 million building, I subsequently discovered the following day, on trying to locate correct contact addresses which were all but elusive except for dogged detective work. All contacts by post were to go to a place that has either since been converted to a post office sorting depot as alternative use or it had always been used to receive mail for the Council. Who Knows?, as I discovered from the various post codes given on the web site bare no relationship to the actual new office building..

Several old post code addresses from previous correspondence over the years had been indicated as being deactivated.

So on entering this great slab of a building, one thing that struck me was that it was not designed to cater for the public. Instead there was a reception desk on the right hand side, curved to blend with what looked like a security access system, and sat at the desk were two females who’s main job was most likely security. The reason that I suspect this is that when I handed them the application form, the immediate response was that I should have taken it to a One Stop Shop to which I explained that I already had the previous day and was rejected and that when I took it to the location provided by the Pension Service it no longer exists.

They took the letter anyway and I asked them to write on the envelope what the contents were and who had provided the form to me and also to date stamp it which they did. I also asked for a receipt for myself to take away and put it straight into my bag without checking it. Unfortunately when I finally arrived home I discovered that although there was a description of what the form was for and whom supplied by, as well as the names of the two receptionists, they omitted to both date and stamp it with an official Council stamp, and they should know that a receipt with out this is usually not accepted as proof of submission or delivery. The heading on the paper is for the Department for Chief Executive and Corporate Resources. The indication therefore is that this building is not designed to cater for the general public, and this is most likely what the One Stop Shops are designed to do. Computers assist in keeping them at arms length. This then can also be a problem when the computer says no and the person responsible difficult to trace or get hold of.

This is obviously something that I will have to actively chase up on, and because the whole situation doesn’t sit right, quite naturally I feel concerned and can visualise where things can go amiss. Anyway time will tell and we can do nothing other but to trust them but the preceding events poses an obvious question mark.

Help the aged claim that there are billions of pounds of unclaimed benefits for pensioners, this has been the case for decades, I believe, as far as I can remember. It has also been pointed out that the UK gives the lowest rate of income for its pensioners within the EU but we can seen that there are supplemental benefits which are to make up for it but somehow there is a feeling of catch 22 about how entitlement to payments are calculated.

Old but still relevant:
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/84120/163-5bn-pensioner-benefits-unclaimed

https://www.saga.co.uk/newsroom/press-releases/2012/september/pensioners-billions-of-pounds-out-of-pocket.aspx

Monday 14th May.

A phone call was made this afternoon to inquire  if the application form had been dropped off at the correct place and after describing events to the person on the other end of the Phone, who was very helpful, it appears that the pension aspect of the claim had created a confusion at the One Stop Shop and that all that was needed was a notification of the change of circumstances.

 

 

The problem is that the present generation have not experienced the realities of the practice of Communism first hand and may hold a romantic notion from the influence of old Communists who claim that Soviet Communism wasn’t true Communism. In fact in Russia today the Communist Party attracted only 11.77% of the vote in the 2018 presidential election.

There is however a situation which has seemingly come about as a result of the fall of Soviet Communism and that is that present day Capitalism has become one of total greed which to the observer may reinforce the the validity of Marx’s writings but in reality both sides reflect human failings and the Nomenclature were nothing more than the Capitalist boss, in attitude towards its people,as projected in the writings of the ideology, but which now seems to have become a reality in the western world and is especially evident in the UK.

It is as if the boot is now on the other foot, as it were, where it is now the once ”Free World” that is fomenting foreign wars through proxies and destroying God centred Nations, like Syria in particular which is secular but upholds the centuries old tradition of encouraging freedom of worship equally for all faiths. The West is seeking to destroy this and supplant sectarianism which it openly supports through funding.

Russia used to have food shortages and long queues which people joined ‘just in case’ there might be something worth having. Now we have our own food shortages for the working poor who’s stagnated wages cannot cover the ever rising cost of housing due to it being an investment vehicle, and also ever rising utility bills but which the inflation rate always seems to maintain an overall figure of around 2%.

Tony Blair and New Labour were advocates of Communitarianism, otherwise known as the Third Way, as was David Cameron and the Coalition Government of 2010 with the promotion of Big Society. The most noticeable feature of the pushing of Big Society was that perfectly functional charities proven to be beneficial to society were having their funding either cut or removed altogether with the result that they would have to close. The idea was that people would volunteer to keep similar organisations running, but I thought that this was a bit rich since people were struggling to maintain their own living standards and keep their heads above water. Also funding to local Councils has been systematically cut over time to such an extent that economies have had to be made by closing public conveniences, buildings which already existed, but they require people to be paid to maintain them. Before Cameron won the election in 2010 I remember him claiming on radio that the rich bosses maintained a wage difference of 400 to 1 over the workers but as soon as he became Prime Minister this figure ended up being reworked to something less dramatic.

So what we are basically seeing is the removal of all of the benefits to society that were fought for by our conscientious forebears who saw the need as a result of poverty during the Victorian period when Britain was at its most prosperous and powerful. We are seeing again where the individual and their plight counts for nothing as witnessed by the number of homeless rough sleepers and the withdrawal of Benefit support to the chronically ill who have been deemed fit for work by a privatised company.

Communitarianism & Its Plan for Society

The Disparaging of Enoch Powell’s Visionary Insight.

There has recently been made much of the “Rivers of Blood ”speech given by Enoch Powell in 1968, and the BBC featured a TV program showing the present generation of descendants viewing the very short portion of film that exists which also serves to project Enoch Powell in a very bad light if not interpreted correctly.  Perhaps the timing of this particular program was intended to someway bounce off and add to the disarray of the Windrush fiasco for political reasons but there is no doubt that the trust of the original influx from the Caribbean has been shamefully betrayed .

Much play was made of the shocked reaction shown by the viewers which was repeated many times throughout the program but there was nothing about the man himself at all, although I was expecting to at least be shown some insights.

People are also confused about Enoch Powell’s reputation because it is also known that he actively helped migrants to arrive from the Caribbean which seems to contradict the racist label that has been attached him.

The famous words attributed to Enoch Powell are actually those expressed by one of his constituents which were repeated in order to act as a foil to the theme of the main body of his speech.

There seems to be a sense of the prophetic visionary about him and in his speech he expresses a moral obligation to address impending problems and not to shy away from exposing them for fear of becoming unpopular or ridiculed.

Back in the 60’s and 70’s we had no concept of the situation that we now find ourselves in from the constant wars in the Middle East, except that we had to deal with the realities of the Cold War and that of the proxy wars taking place throughout Africa and South America, sponsored by the old Soviet Union.

In the speech there is mention of repatriating people to their country of origin and of even migrants requesting themselves to be helped to return to their homeland, but at this present time there are no homes to return to because whole countries have been decimated by the “7 Countries in 7 years” agenda of the US shadow government. It’s as if this minor detail has now been dealt with by complete ruination ensuring that refugees remain so.

Also the demise of the Soviet Union and the integration of East European countries back into the “Western” fold has facilitated the route into once homogeneous Nation States protected by borders.

Now reflecting on the words of Enoch Powell’s constituent who back in 1968 expressed: “If I had the money to go, I wouldn’t stay in this country”, he will now find that there is nowhere to go that would satisfy this particular desire.

When New Labour was in office under Tony Blair and immigration numbers reached 350,000 per year, the MSM made great play of immigration from Poland, seemingly with the intent of channeling peoples concerns towards them only. Polish people were like a breath of fresh air in their outlook and abilities and there are many instances of personal experience with them to validate this sentiment. However this finger pointing was quite curious to me because the Polish were only one small segment of the A8 group of European immigration into the UK and there were many times more from India and Pakistan but for some unknown reason it was never ever mentioned that the bulk of emigration was from African countries who’s aggregate number exceeded that of the A8, Indian and Pakistan combined. This was never ever mentioned even though these figures were available from National Statistics.

So it seems that there was an agenda being covered up although Tony Blair had been awarded the Kallergi award from the EU for promoting immigration and Peter Mandelson admitted to New Labour having been actively looking for immigrants to bring into the UK. There is a side issue though and this is to do with housing and the investment potential which was stoked by New Labour immediately from 1997 when they first won the General Election but which has continued on through the Coalition of 2010 by other financial incentives. The stress on housing availability equals increased profits.

On further reflection, in late August 2015, the last time that I had reason to visit Hannover in Germany, I noticed for the first time smartly dressed young males who were obviously from Africa and their demeanour was one of being well behaved and respectful and felt that they understood the German way of life and behaviour and would integrate well. Two weeks later there was the huge influx of migrants invited by Angela Merkel and the resulting problems that followed that made the headlines in the media.

This item was furthest from my mind this morning and the intended things to do for the day had been mapped out from before the weekend, but also there was a report in the morning news that Martin Lewis, who runs the Money Saving Expert web site, intends to sue Facebook for not removing fake investment articles which are cheating vulnerable people out of vast amounts their money. I had wanted to write about this and was already clearly worded in mind but a whisper in my ear suggested Enoch Powell instead.

Full text of Enoch Powell’s “Rivers of Blood Speech”.
Enoch Powell’s ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech

Words of Enoch Powell: [Quote] A week or two ago I fell into conversation with a constituent, a middle-aged, quite ordinary working man employed in one of our nationalised industries.
After a sentence or two about the weather, he suddenly said: “If I had the money to go, I wouldn’t stay in this country.” I made some deprecatory reply to the effect that even this government wouldn’t last for ever; but he took no notice, and continued: “I have three children, all of them been through grammar school and two of them married now, with family. I shan’t be satisfied till I have seen them all settled overseas. In this country in 15 or 20 years’ time the black man will have the whip hand over the white man.”
I can already hear the chorus of execration. How dare I say such a horrible thing? How dare I stir up trouble and inflame feelings by repeating such a conversation?
The answer is that I do not have the right not to do so. Here is a decent, ordinary fellow Englishman, who in broad daylight in my own town says to me, his Member of Parliament, that his country will not be worth living in for his children.[unquote]

Enoch Powell was a fair minded man who believed in equality for all citizens:
[Quote]The third element of the Conservative Party’s policy is that all who are in this country as citizens should be equal before the law and that there shall be no discrimination or difference made between them by public authority. As Mr Heath has put it we will have no “first-class citizens” and “second-class citizens.” This does not mean that the immigrant and his descendant should be elevated into a privileged or special class or that the citizen should be denied his right to discriminate in the management of his own affairs between one fellow-citizen and another or that he should be subjected to imposition as to his reasons and motive for behaving in one lawful manner rather than another.[unquote]

From, The News Doctors
Soros / CIA Plan to Destabilize Europe by Wayne Madsen.

Also
2013 – 043 The EU Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan – The Genocide Of The Caucasian People Of Europe and Agenda 21

The following interview with Andrew Ashdown was found because I was curious about today’s news regarding Brendan Cox and Save the Children charity but this was with the knowledge of his support for the White Helmets, the western sponsored terrorists masquerading as first responders in Syria. The relationship with the White Helmets had been revealed at the time of his wife’s murder just prior to the Brexit Referendum vote and of course the White Helmets were being projected to the public as a good thing and worthy.

So this morning a search was made about the relationship between Brendan Cox, Save the Children and the White Helmets.

An article published in 2016 just after the murder of Jo Cox, assembled together many interesting facts in ‘The Truth About The Late Joe Cox and Her Husband, Brendan’ and it was quite comprehensive but had been spoilt with pages to links no longer available as well as videos. Also sections of commentary are obviously missing with the links jammed into the narrative as a replacement.

The facts mentioned in the article were never covered by MSM in their shining reports but clues would emerged for the sharp eared.

The article by CNN called Syrian Civil War Fast Facts was found during the search and the most interesting thing about this post, ignoring their political stance, is the record of the great onslaught of international pressure from the beginning during the very early months of 2011. Of course such rapid action can be understood better in the light of a talk by Andrew Ashdown, an Anglican Minister who had traveled extensively in Syria many time since 2003, and in a talk given locally, several years ago around the time of this video interview, he added, as a piece of incidental
information, that he had met a leading internal opposition leader (in 2015) who told him that he had been contacted by by phone in 2010 from somebody in Turkey who told him ”Get ready, the war is coming, it has all been planned”. Of all the similar interviews searched none mentioned this point directly from Andrew Ashdown himself but is reported second hand on the program. However I do have an mp3 of this comment given at a local presentation which also included projected pictures of his experience.

Andrew Ashdown Interview 2016
Back from Aleppo Rev. Andrew Ashdown: London media “diabloical, supporting terrorist Syrian rebels.”

Here is another article which documents the progression of the war in Syria.
Syrian Civil War Fast Facts

It is crazy that the US,France and the UK are happy to create a constantly fighting sectarian wasteland in Syria in the name of humanitarianism.

This morning 17th April there had been reports of an overnight attack on Syria but adding that the US said that it wasn’t them, so then it was suspected to be Israel. All MSM news is is focused on other news items since the US France and UK attack in the early hours of Saturday just hours befor the OPCW’s arrival into the country and RT are still on Saturday’s raid and the consequential backlash of anti war protests in all countries involved.

What this action reveals is a policy of perpetual attack upon Syria and this time there was no need for a false flag pretext to woo the population into the notion that it is justified. Therefore this means that Israel can commit any action without repercussions, an uncontrolled aggressor without constraint.

A particular feature of an attitude or philosophy that Israel has expressed has also been mirrored in the US,French and US stance which to anybody else’s judgement is the mark of the bully.

In the report pertaining to Israel there is a statement, a comment that caught my eye was the following:
[Quote]Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called Syria’s retaliation “unacceptable”, stating that “if anyone attempts to harm us, we will harm them back”.[quote]

A similar attitude was made from US, France and UK which stated words to the effect that if Syria retaliates it would be an act of war.

Article 51 of the UN charter recognizes the right to self-defence by any state if it comes under attack.

The idea of decisions based on morality is laughable.

Another strategy to ensure perpetual war on Syria is that Donald Trump has asked Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates to replace American troops, thus perpetuating war unseen to the western public. Arab troops instead of their pet terrorists including ISIS, there is proof about this from the horses mouth.
.

Below is a report from the Middle East Monitor

Israel warplanes launch overnight attack on Syria

Yesterday, one thing that I had forgotten to mention in my last post is that the OPCW need to be looked at more closely for its credibility. This morning It had been mentioned that Russia has vetoed UN call for inspections six times but on doing a search the links to news feeds on this point dominate and have seen reports of up to 11 Vetoes.

So, the thought this morning was that perhaps by mentioning the feeling that the OPCW needs to be looked at more thoroughly was the hope that this could be done by people in a position more qualified to do so.

The strong narrative pertaining to the number of times that Russia has vetoed inspections naturally leads one to believe that Assad is guilty and that the Russians are just simply exercising a blatant cover up.

Considering the feeling that the the efficacy of the OPCW itself needs to be investigated then naturally this lends to the idea that perhaps this is the main reason for the constant Russian vetoes because once the OPCW’s ”verdict” is given then it gives permission for an all out assault on Syria with the objective to remove Assad which was what this war was all about from the beginning in 2011 and pre planned, it is said in 2010.

So looking at current events in Salisbury of which the accusation tilted towards Russia without proof, and the Russians level headed response which borders on the reasonable according to once normal international norms of law, then this lends weight towards seeking for the reason for the constant Russian Vetoes at the UN.

So this item from a year ago surfaced like a shining diamond in a sea of darkness and is self explanatory:

https://www.rt.com/news/408510-opcw-un-report-syria-amateurish/  

 

Today’s edition of the UK Column, 20th April 2018, has been added to this article a clear 7 days after questioning the veracity of the OPCW. The video speaks for itself.

False Flag Chemical Attack in Syria
[Quote]On February 13 the Russian Center for the Reconciliation of Opposing Sides in Syria noted a warning of an upcoming false-flag ‘chemical attack’ incident:
“On the evening of February 12, a resident from the Serakab settlement located in the Idlib province called the Russian Center for Reconciliaition to notify (the center) about a chemical weapons attack that could be staged to provide footage for a foreign TV channel,” the statement reads. “The caller said that earlier on February 12, Jabhat al-Nusra members travelling in three cars had brought more than 20 chlorine gas cylinders and personal protective equipment to Serakab,” the Center added.
“According to the caller, members of the local While Helmets branch wore personal protective equipment while rehearsing first aid provision to civilians suffering from chemical poisoning,” the Russian Center said.
…
“The caller pointed out that all the proceedings had been filmed by professional reporters who used a mic with the CNN logo, while commenting on the actions being taken by the White Helmets,” the statement said, adding that in between takes, the reporters had consulted with some people over a satellite telephone in English.[unquote]
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/48806.htm

Also
[Quote] AFP reports:
“At the moment, I am not totally convinced because the people that are helping them are without any protective clothing and without any respirators,” said Paula Vanninen, director of Verifin, the Finnish Institute for Verification of the Chemical Weapons Convention.
“In a real case, they would also be contaminated and would also be having symptoms.”
John Hart, head of the Chemical and Biological Security Project at Stockholm International Peace Research Institute said he had not seen the telltale evidence in the eyes of the victims that would be compelling evidence of chemical weapons use.[unquote]
http://washingtonsblog.com/…/is-u-s-launching-a-war-in-syri…

A very relevant edition of UK Column today:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87SNuJU2cl4

It is interesting that President of France, Macron claims that he has proof of chemical weapons having been used in Syria, readily blaming Assad.

[Quote]The French president does not need parliamentary permission to launch a military operation. France is already involved in the US-led coalition to fight Isis in Syria and Iraq.
The attack was first reported by Syrian rebel group Jaish al-Islam on Saturday.
Inspectors with the global chemical weapons watchdog, the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, are due to investigate the incident.[unquote]

Interesting, just like the UK, France does not need to consult with its parliament to go to war and since Cameron had secretly made a 50 year military pact with France we have a situation which flies in the face of claims that the EU was created to maintain peace in Europe. Not only that but Macron is willing to commit French lives and those of others on the claims made by Jaish al-Islam.
Take a look at the following video to see how captives of this group were treated by Jaish al-Islam , from the first hand testimonies.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eB78ycwzh

As I was returning to links to make screenshots of Macron’s statement, two had appeared and immediately dissolved and disappeared in front of my eyes off of the page. Last night there was a documentary on the PBS Channel about the beginnings of the Vietnam War and it began because the people were fed up with the unjust treatment of the Colonial French. They hated the French because of their treatment more than they disliked Communism. The French were failing badly and had no hope so the Americans stepped in selling it as a war against Communism which was ravaging other countries at that time. The fact is that America was an ally of France but the Vietnamese wanted the support of America to obtain independence and when they refused the Vietnamese turned to Russia instead.

The news on Monday 26th March 2018 seemed to be a watershed of component parts, of issues which may take the World in a direction not wanted by general population but by those who have access to the reigns of power Internationally.

There is a relentless attack against Donald Trump despite the fact that during the Inaugural Dinner he basically forgave Hillary Clinton for her security breach of running her own email server used for government matters and putting National Security in danger. He could have pursued her with the weight of his office behind him but did not. This attitude has not been reciprocated the other way from those who are peeved about losing the election to him as well as deep state manipulators who no doubt regard Trump as an outsider.

When Jesus said Let those without sin cast the first stone to those who were about to stone to death a woman accused of adultery, this reflected a truth that persists to this day and the saying that when a finger is pointed towards others there are three pointing back.

The question that comes to mind is, has Donald Trump ever attended the goings on at Bohemian Grove or been a participant of Skull and Bones rituals. Probably not.

In a similar way we are witnessing an attack on Jeremy Corbyn, in this case via the Jewish Leadership Council. There have been calls for an organisation like the American Anti Defamation League in Britain but during the 1980s criticism was made of it, by those who were critical of the Soviet Union during the Cold War, of the nature of their activities. You can take a look at how the ADL presents itself on its own web site and compare it to this article made in 2013:

http://solargeneral.org/adl-spies/

Question: what is the definition of an anti-Semite? Would it be enough to simply question the unjust and cruel treatment of Palestinians in their own, confiscated, national homeland by the Jewish state?

Like Trump, Jeremy Corbyn, as the leader of the Labour Party, has been relentlessly attacked from the beginning of his leadership. Had it not been for the Alternative Vote, a system of voting rejected in a referendum by the population as an answer to the ‘first pass the post’ system used in General Elections, then the recognised favourite David Milliband would most likely have not been beaten by his brother Ed. In a sense it was a fortunate outcome and although David would have been the most capable in the role of leadership of NewLabour, his allegiances are made clear by the associations connected to his job in America in much the same way as that of Tony Blair. All would have been hunky dory.

So the similarities between Trump and Corbyn have not been lost on the media, resulting in the mode of constant disparaging. Fortunately we did not get a Blairite in the Labour Party and Hillary Clinton’s reputation as a potential warmonger, and the possibility that Jeb Bush may have also filled that position was no doubt recognised as undesirable by the general population and could quite possibly have been a large contributory factor in their defeat (Jeb Bush saw the writing on the wall and backed out. He was the Governor of Florida during the 2000 Presidential election that saw Al Gore, who was convinced that he had won, defeated as a result of multiple recounts which resulted in Jeb’s brother George W taking office and Kicking off the so called War on Terror. Perhaps what we know now it should be renamed the war by terror, beginning with 911.).

To continue on a theme, it looks like the World is headed in an enforced confrontation with Russia as a result of an issue that has not been conclusively proven that Russia was the culprit. It is only by the association with circumstantial evidence from the past, which can be used to incriminate those who may be completely innocent and it does not bode well that International due process has been disregarded let alone the principles on which the British legal system has been based on for centuries, with the beginnings going back as far as 10th century Saxon England but which Teresa May felt fit to cast aside and demand that Russia provide proof that it did not commit the crime in Salisbury with consequential repercussions within 24 hours if it declined to do so. This is quite an insult to a sovereign nation. In traditional UK law there is an assumption of innocence until proven guilty but this is reversed in European, Napoleon code law, exactly as Teresa May has used. Her sincerity of moving away from the control of the Supranational block of the EU must be put into question.

To be continued. Possibly.

Here is the continuation of the promised continuation, most of which was writen down in longhand while travelling on the bus while I was in the ”Mode”. Refinement and proofs had to be added today and had to make the effort to do so which is difficult to get back into once stopped:

Continuation of A Watershed of Component parts

Of course the relationship between the EU and Putin was very different in 2010, being based on a deal signed towards the end of 2010, eight months after the Smolensk air crash which decimated the complete polish government who had opposed such an agreement.

Donald Tusk was happy to maintain the investigation at arms length from the Polish people by allowing Russia exclusive control over the evidence pertaining to the investigation and is also on record of insisting that it was pilot error which was the cause of the crash.

During this honeymoon period Bill Clinton had expressed, in a communication to Tony Blair, that Putin is an intelligent and trustworthy partner and that they could work with him. This is what Bill Clinton had to say about Putin in 2014.

From Politico [Quote] However, Clinton, citing his own dealings with Putin, said the Russian president was never misleading.

“The one thing I will say about him is he was always pretty transparent. He never pretended to be what he wasn’t and I found in dealing with him—and by the way, with most other leaders with whom I had differences—that it was best to be brutal with him in private and be honest because they respected you if you were, and then as long as you could, to avoid embarrassing them in public,” Clinton said.

“You can normally work with someone like that and I just hope and pray this thing is not going to spin out of hand,” he said.

Bill Clinton once told Tony Blair that Vladimir Putin had ‘enormous potential’

Eventually this relationship was soon to sour because Putin also had independent ambitions for the the betterment of Russia.

There was the convolution of Russia’s intent to create a trading block in Eurasia, separate from the EU initially and America’s intent to prevent it. Notice the date of 6^th May 2012. Putin also had the intent of moving away from the US dollar for dealing in oil, and then the later development of BRICKS.

Continental unification project of European and Eurasian unions

I remember reading about Angela Merkel being very enthusiastic in doing business with Russia about this time, possibly 2011, even at the expense of the EU, this was suspected but of course all of this changed with the annexation of the Crimea and the American driven sanctions over the matter and of course there was the shooting down of the airliner with a BUK missile of which there was dispute over which side actually fired it, the Ukrainians or Russia.

Russia also entered the Syrian conflict as the only country legally permitted to do so, after years of looking on in 2015 but the question is when was the decision made to separate from the West’s shenanigans in the Middle East? The Arab Spring began in 2011 but plans were already in place to invade Syria in 2010, a year before the induced riots and protests there in 2011 and Assad is the only one able to resist over time which was something that I had felt he would do and expressed it in a roundabout way ending with ‘If ever’ .

It was my immediate opinion, at the time of the annexation of Crimea, that this pattern of modus operandi was too clear to see and when the coup de tate in the Ukraine to oust an elected leader took place, then it was too close to home, and for geostrategic reasons it was essential to regain possession of the Crimea.

The Crimea was successfully taken back into the Russian field of influence, obviously for strategic reasons, and this was achieved with the consent of the population by a referendum and given the approval of the population, although MSM reports would have us believe a different scenario.

The Case for Crimea’s Unification with the Russian Federation

Also mentioned on the news of 26^th Match was the election in Egypt with comments couched in disparaging language towards ??? Sisi. This small but significant mention in the style that it was, was also something that I had been anticipating since the time when everything cooled down in Egypt so when Sisi arrived in London in 2015 and shook hands with David Cameron, the prime question then was how long would it be when Sisi begins to receive the Sadam Hussain, Mohamar Gadhaffi and Assad treatment? Just like Putin they had their own plans for their country, they were also strong men when required and as necessary, and this is proved by the chaotic state of those countries as a result of their planned removal.

One important element of the Egyptian revolution is that the Army took a stance to protect the population from Hosni mubarack’s military police who had responded with over the top aggressiveness towards militant protestors but of course the general population got caught up in it as well because they were encouraged to participate, quite rightly so, to air their grievances, though in a peaceful manner. Employment was sparse for educated people in much the same way here in the UK but which seems to be accepted as part of austerity. The devaluation of Egyptian currency and other aspects which are accepted as part and parcel of our own economy were presented by msm with emotive language against Sisi. As it is said, when there is a finger pointing with accusation there are three pointing back and this is where the hypocrisy needs to be pointed out when it is used as justification for military intervention which looks like it will eventually be on the cards.

When MSM states that SiSi deposed the first democratically elected president, Morsi, they conveniently forgot that the Military, who had presided as an interim government, allowed free elections which also included the Muslim Brotherhood who had been banned as a matter of course in Egypt for countless decades previously. Their win was accepted as promised but it came to an end when there was an attempt to change the Egyptian Constitution as well as other issues of concern voiced by the general population. Just found an article that explains in a nutshell.

Why Mursi of Egypt had to Go

Also, as observed at the time of the Egyptian Revolution of 2011, was that Elbaradi was trying to insert himself into the mix and it was apparent by his activities and associations that he was Washington’s man but had not managed to gain any influence on outcomes and was basically ignored.