The Disparaging of the Visionary Insight of Enoch Powell

The Disparaging of Enoch Powell’s Visionary Insight.

There has recently been made much of the “Rivers of Blood ”speech given by Enoch Powell in 1968, and the BBC featured a TV program showing the present generation of descendants viewing the very short portion of film that exists which also serves to project Enoch Powell in a very bad light if not interpreted correctly.  Perhaps the timing of this particular program was intended to someway bounce off and add to the disarray of the Windrush fiasco for political reasons but there is no doubt that the trust of the original influx from the Caribbean has been shamefully betrayed .

Much play was made of the shocked reaction shown by the viewers which was repeated many times throughout the program but there was nothing about the man himself at all, although I was expecting to at least be shown some insights.

People are also confused about Enoch Powell’s reputation because it is also known that he actively helped migrants to arrive from the Caribbean which seems to contradict the racist label that has been attached him.

The famous words attributed to Enoch Powell are actually those expressed by one of his constituents which were repeated in order to act as a foil to the theme of the main body of his speech.

There seems to be a sense of the prophetic visionary about him and in his speech he expresses a moral obligation to address impending problems and not to shy away from exposing them for fear of becoming unpopular or ridiculed.

Back in the 60’s and 70’s we had no concept of the situation that we now find ourselves in from the constant wars in the Middle East, except that we had to deal with the realities of the Cold War and that of the proxy wars taking place throughout Africa and South America, sponsored by the old Soviet Union.

In the speech there is mention of repatriating people to their country of origin and of even migrants requesting themselves to be helped to return to their homeland, but at this present time there are no homes to return to because whole countries have been decimated by the “7 Countries in 7 years” agenda of the US shadow government. It’s as if this minor detail has now been dealt with by complete ruination ensuring that refugees remain so.

Also the demise of the Soviet Union and the integration of East European countries back into the “Western” fold has facilitated the route into once homogeneous Nation States protected by borders.

Now reflecting on the words of Enoch Powell’s constituent who back in 1968 expressed: “If I had the money to go, I wouldn’t stay in this country”, he will now find that there is nowhere to go that would satisfy this particular desire.

When New Labour was in office under Tony Blair and immigration numbers reached 350,000 per year, the MSM made great play of immigration from Poland, seemingly with the intent of channeling peoples concerns towards them only. Polish people were like a breath of fresh air in their outlook and abilities and there are many instances of personal experience with them to validate this sentiment. However this finger pointing was quite curious to me because the Polish were only one small segment of the A8 group of European immigration into the UK and there were many times more from India and Pakistan but for some unknown reason it was never ever mentioned that the bulk of emigration was from African countries who’s aggregate number exceeded that of the A8, Indian and Pakistan combined. This was never ever mentioned even though these figures were available from National Statistics.

So it seems that there was an agenda being covered up although Tony Blair had been awarded the Kallergi award from the EU for promoting immigration and Peter Mandelson admitted to New Labour having been actively looking for immigrants to bring into the UK. There is a side issue though and this is to do with housing and the investment potential which was stoked by New Labour immediately from 1997 when they first won the General Election but which has continued on through the Coalition of 2010 by other financial incentives. The stress on housing availability equals increased profits.

On further reflection, in late August 2015, the last time that I had reason to visit Hannover in Germany, I noticed for the first time smartly dressed young males who were obviously from Africa and their demeanour was one of being well behaved and respectful and felt that they understood the German way of life and behaviour and would integrate well. Two weeks later there was the huge influx of migrants invited by Angela Merkel and the resulting problems that followed that made the headlines in the media.

This item was furthest from my mind this morning and the intended things to do for the day had been mapped out from before the weekend, but also there was a report in the morning news that Martin Lewis, who runs the Money Saving Expert web site, intends to sue Facebook for not removing fake investment articles which are cheating vulnerable people out of vast amounts their money. I had wanted to write about this and was already clearly worded in mind but a whisper in my ear suggested Enoch Powell instead.

Full text of Enoch Powell’s “Rivers of Blood Speech”.
Enoch Powell’s ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech

Words of Enoch Powell: [Quote] A week or two ago I fell into conversation with a constituent, a middle-aged, quite ordinary working man employed in one of our nationalised industries.
After a sentence or two about the weather, he suddenly said: “If I had the money to go, I wouldn’t stay in this country.” I made some deprecatory reply to the effect that even this government wouldn’t last for ever; but he took no notice, and continued: “I have three children, all of them been through grammar school and two of them married now, with family. I shan’t be satisfied till I have seen them all settled overseas. In this country in 15 or 20 years’ time the black man will have the whip hand over the white man.
I can already hear the chorus of execration. How dare I say such a horrible thing? How dare I stir up trouble and inflame feelings by repeating such a conversation?
The answer is that I do not have the right not to do so. Here is a decent, ordinary fellow Englishman, who in broad daylight in my own town says to me, his Member of Parliament, that his country will not be worth living in for his children.[unquote]

Enoch Powell was a fair minded man who believed in equality for all citizens:
[Quote]The third element of the Conservative Party’s policy is that all who are in this country as citizens should be equal before the law and that there shall be no discrimination or difference made between them by public authority. As Mr Heath has put it we will have no “first-class citizens” and “second-class citizens.” This does not mean that the immigrant and his descendant should be elevated into a privileged or special class or that the citizen should be denied his right to discriminate in the management of his own affairs between one fellow-citizen and another or that he should be subjected to imposition as to his reasons and motive for behaving in one lawful manner rather than another.[unquote]

From, The News Doctors
Soros / CIA Plan to Destabilize Europe by Wayne Madsen.

2013 – 043 The EU Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan – The Genocide Of The Caucasian People Of Europe and Agenda 21

Andrew Ashdown Tells of his experiences On The Ground in Syria

The following interview with Andrew Ashdown was found because I was curious about today’s news regarding Brendan Cox and Save the Children charity but this was with the knowledge of his support for the White Helmets, the western sponsored terrorists masquerading as first responders in Syria. The relationship with the White Helmets had been revealed at the time of his wife’s murder just prior to the Brexit Referendum vote and of course the White Helmets were being projected to the public as a good thing and worthy.

So this morning a search was made about the relationship between Brendan Cox, Save the Children and the White Helmets.

An article published in 2016 just after the murder of Jo Cox, assembled together many interesting facts in ‘The Truth About The Late Joe Cox and Her Husband, Brendan’ and it was quite comprehensive but had been spoilt with pages to links no longer available as well as videos. Also sections of commentary are obviously missing with the links jammed into the narrative as a replacement.

The facts mentioned in the article were never covered by MSM in their shining reports but clues would emerged for the sharp eared.

The article by CNN called Syrian Civil War Fast Facts was found during the search and the most interesting thing about this post, ignoring their political stance, is the record of the great onslaught of international pressure from the beginning during the very early months of 2011. Of course such rapid action can be understood better in the light of a talk by Andrew Ashdown, an Anglican Minister who had traveled extensively in Syria many time since 2003, and in a talk given locally, several years ago around the time of this video interview, he added, as a piece of incidental
information, that he had met a leading internal opposition leader (in 2015) who told him that he had been contacted by by phone in 2010 from somebody in Turkey who told him ”Get ready, the war is coming, it has all been planned”. Of all the similar interviews searched none mentioned this point directly from Andrew Ashdown himself but is reported second hand on the program. However I do have an mp3 of this comment given at a local presentation which also included projected pictures of his experience.

Andrew Ashdown Interview 2016
Back from Aleppo Rev. Andrew Ashdown: London media “diabloical, supporting terrorist Syrian rebels.”

Here is another article which documents the progression of the war in Syria.
Syrian Civil War Fast Facts

It is crazy that the US,France and the UK are happy to create a constantly fighting sectarian wasteland in Syria in the name of humanitarianism.

Perpetual War on Syria Continued by Israel

This morning 17th April there had been reports of an overnight attack on Syria but adding that the US said that it wasn’t them, so then it was suspected to be Israel. All MSM news is is focused on other news items since the US France and UK attack in the early hours of Saturday just hours befor the OPCW’s arrival into the country and RT are still on Saturday’s raid and the consequential backlash of anti war protests in all countries involved.

What this action reveals is a policy of perpetual attack upon Syria and this time there was no need for a false flag pretext to woo the population into the notion that it is justified. Therefore this means that Israel can commit any action without repercussions, an uncontrolled aggressor without constraint.

A particular feature of an attitude or philosophy that Israel has expressed has also been mirrored in the US,French and US stance which to anybody else’s judgement is the mark of the bully.

In the report pertaining to Israel there is a statement, a comment that caught my eye was the following:
[Quote]Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called Syria’s retaliation “unacceptable”, stating that “if anyone attempts to harm us, we will harm them back”.[quote]

A similar attitude was made from US, France and UK which stated words to the effect that if Syria retaliates it would be an act of war.

Article 51 of the UN charter recognizes the right to self-defence by any state if it comes under attack.

The idea of decisions based on morality is laughable.

Another strategy to ensure perpetual war on Syria is that Donald Trump has asked Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates to replace American troops, thus perpetuating war unseen to the western public. Arab troops instead of their pet terrorists including ISIS, there is proof about this from the horses mouth.

Below is a report from the Middle East Monitor

Israel warplanes launch overnight attack on Syria

The Efficacy of the OPCW Needs To Be investigated as cause for Russian Veto of UN Resolutions to Check Gas Attacks In Syria

Yesterday, one thing that I had forgotten to mention in my last post is that the OPCW need to be looked at more closely for its credibility. This morning It had been mentioned that Russia has vetoed UN call for inspections six times but on doing a search the links to news feeds on this point dominate and have seen reports of up to 11 Vetoes.

So, the thought this morning was that perhaps by mentioning the feeling that the OPCW needs to be looked at more thoroughly was the hope that this could be done by people in a position more qualified to do so.

The strong narrative pertaining to the number of times that Russia has vetoed inspections naturally leads one to believe that Assad is guilty and that the Russians are just simply exercising a blatant cover up.

Considering the feeling that the the efficacy of the OPCW itself needs to be investigated then naturally this lends to the idea that perhaps this is the main reason for the constant Russian vetoes because once the OPCW’s ”verdict” is given then it gives permission for an all out assault on Syria with the objective to remove Assad which was what this war was all about from the beginning in 2011 and pre planned, it is said in 2010.

So looking at current events in Salisbury of which the accusation tilted towards Russia without proof, and the Russians level headed response which borders on the reasonable according to once normal international norms of law, then this lends weight towards seeking for the reason for the constant Russian Vetoes at the UN.

So this item from a year ago surfaced like a shining diamond in a sea of darkness and is self explanatory:  


Today’s edition of the UK Column, 20th April 2018, has been added to this article a clear 7 days after questioning the veracity of the OPCW. The video speaks for itself.

Evidence of False Flag Chemical Attack in Syria

False Flag Chemical Attack in Syria
[Quote]On February 13 the Russian Center for the Reconciliation of Opposing Sides in Syria noted a warning of an upcoming false-flag ‘chemical attack’ incident:
“On the evening of February 12, a resident from the Serakab settlement located in the Idlib province called the Russian Center for Reconciliaition to notify (the center) about a chemical weapons attack that could be staged to provide footage for a foreign TV channel,” the statement reads. “The caller said that earlier on February 12, Jabhat al-Nusra members travelling in three cars had brought more than 20 chlorine gas cylinders and personal protective equipment to Serakab,” the Center added.
“According to the caller, members of the local While Helmets branch wore personal protective equipment while rehearsing first aid provision to civilians suffering from chemical poisoning,” the Russian Center said.

“The caller pointed out that all the proceedings had been filmed by professional reporters who used a mic with the CNN logo, while commenting on the actions being taken by the White Helmets,” the statement said, adding that in between takes, the reporters had consulted with some people over a satellite telephone in English.[unquote]

[Quote] AFP reports:
“At the moment, I am not totally convinced because the people that are helping them are without any protective clothing and without any respirators,” said Paula Vanninen, director of Verifin, the Finnish Institute for Verification of the Chemical Weapons Convention.
In a real case, they would also be contaminated and would also be having symptoms.”
John Hart, head of the Chemical and Biological Security Project at Stockholm International Peace Research Institute said he had not seen the telltale evidence in the eyes of the victims that would be compelling evidence of chemical weapons use.[unquote]…/is-u-s-launching-a-war-in-syri…

A very relevant edition of UK Column today:

It is interesting that President of France, Macron claims that he has proof of chemical weapons having been used in Syria, readily blaming Assad.

[Quote]The French president does not need parliamentary permission to launch a military operation. France is already involved in the US-led coalition to fight Isis in Syria and Iraq.
The attack was first reported by Syrian rebel group Jaish al-Islam on Saturday.
Inspectors with the global chemical weapons watchdog, the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, are due to investigate the incident.[unquote]

Interesting, just like the UK, France does not need to consult with its parliament to go to war and since Cameron had secretly made a 50 year military pact with France we have a situation which flies in the face of claims that the EU was created to maintain peace in Europe. Not only that but Macron is willing to commit French lives and those of others on the claims made by Jaish al-Islam.
Take a look at the following video to see how captives of this group were treated by Jaish al-Islam , from the first hand testimonies.

As I was returning to links to make screenshots of Macron’s statement, two had appeared and immediately dissolved and disappeared in front of my eyes off of the page. Last night there was a documentary on the PBS Channel about the beginnings of the Vietnam War and it began because the people were fed up with the unjust treatment of the Colonial French. They hated the French because of their treatment more than they disliked Communism. The French were failing badly and had no hope so the Americans stepped in selling it as a war against Communism which was ravaging other countries at that time. The fact is that America was an ally of France but the Vietnamese wanted the support of America to obtain independence and when they refused the Vietnamese turned to Russia instead.