The Evolving Pattern of Man Made Conflict

The contents of this article is very profound in the understanding they provide and their discovery only came about as a result of the need to check timelines related to the Kurds fighting ISIS all alone because having made this statement in the Macon article posted on Saturday, by the following Monday the news was making reference to America aiding the Kurds which at this present time appears to be true. Therefore dates and timelines are very important when it comes to understanding the unfolding of events.

The current news, although true, had also served to diminish what had been stated, re the Kurds, and at the same time present America in a better light, but this present stance is the result of the current set of unfolding circumstances.

The intention of research was solely to establish the timeline related to the Kurds but in the process of looking, information revealing a much broader view came to light. It begins with the philosophy of the American Neocons before 911 and covers the elements of the second emboldened statement
but most importantly their concept of Armageddon and Nuclear war to bring about the Second Coming of Christ, a concept also held by certain Muslims to bring about the appearance of the Mahdi and also certain Jews who believe that it will bring about their long expected Messiah.

This subject is an area that was touched on several years ago and I made notes in order to post (but as of yet I am unable to find them) and at the same time came across a section of James Padgett’s writings from Jesus and the Celestial Spirits which are communications through the mediumship of automatic writing and which represent Jesus’ Second Coming on Earth, now in Spirit only which is also explained.

Therefore it is important to understand that the whole concept and belief in a physical return of the Messiah as a result of the destruction of the World is totally unfounded and incorrect and will never happen, though destruction could take place as a result of misguided belief.

1). Now the Kurds who had always made the effort to deal with ISIS in its North Eastern regions of Syria, all alone and unaided are now being portrayed as a threat to Turkey.

2). Weapons to this region began flooding out of Libya immediately after the death of Gadhafi in October 2011, part of the seven countries in five years strategy following the false flag of 911 and murder 3000 international citizens, resulting in ” The War On Terror”, the arrest without charge, special rendition, sometimes of innocents as well as incarceration at Guantanamo, all actions which acted as a natural recruiting sargent to activate conscientious resistance on one hand as well as criminal minds and mercenaries on the other to stir up conflict in order to enable ”justified” military response.

It is very interesting to note that this same John Bolton served under both George Herbert Bush and George Walker Bush and there was also speculation that he may serve with Donald Trump as secretary of State but luckily that did not happen. Also of interest is that he often criticised Obama’s actions, but that is the job of opposition, which also serves as a red herring for obfuscation, but regardless the agenda proceeds seamlessly forward.

[Quote] The Bush administration’s international lawlessness did not come from nowhere. Its intellectual foundations were laid long before 9/11 by neoconservative intellectuals such as United Nations Ambassador John Bolton. …… Way back when Bush was still cutting brush in Texas in 1999, Bolton said, “It is a big mistake for us to grant any validity to international law even when it may seem in our short-term interest to do so – because, over the long term, the goal of those who think that international law really means anything are [sic] those who want to constrict the United States.”
John Bolton helped put into reality the musings of neocon founding father Irving Kristol, who wrote in the Wall Street Journal Aug. 2, 1996, “With the end of the Cold War, what we really need is an obvious ideology and threatening enemy, one worthy of our mettle, one that can unite us in opposition.” [Unquote]
https://original.antiwar.com/utley/2006/09/27/john-bolton-and-us-lawlessness/
(The whole of the above article is in context with this post)

Ideological influences continued:
[Quote] The revelation this month in GQ Magazine that Donald Rumsfeld as Defense Secretary embellished top-secret wartime memos with quotations from the Bible prompts a question. Why did he believe he could influence President Bush by that means?
The answer may lie in an alarming story about George Bush’s Christian millenarian beliefs that has yet to come to light.
In 2003 while lobbying leaders to put together the Coalition of the Willing, President Bush spoke to France’s President Jacques Chirac. Bush wove a story about how the Biblical creatures Gog and Magog were at work in the Middle East and how they must be defeated.
In Genesis and Ezekiel Gog and Magog are forces of the Apocalypse who are prophesied to come out of the north and destroy Israel unless stopped. The Book of Revelation took up the Old Testament prophesy:
“And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them.”
Bush believed the time had now come for that battle, telling Chirac:
“This confrontation is willed by God, who wants to use this conflict to erase his people’s enemies before a New Age begins“.
The story of the conversation emerged only because the Elyse Palace, baffled by Bush’s words, sought advice from Thomas Romer, a professor of theology at the University of Lausanne. Four years later, Romer gave an account in the September 2007 issue of the university’s review, Allez savoir. The article apparently went unnoticed, although it was referred to in a French newspaper.
The story has now been confirmed by Chirac himself in a new book, published in France in March, by journalist Jean Claude Maurice. Chirac is said to have been stupefied and disturbed by Bush’s invocation of Biblical prophesy to justify the war in Iraq and “wondered how someone could be so superficial and fanatical in their beliefs”.
In the same year he spoke to Chirac, Bush had reportedly said to the Palestinian foreign minister that he was on “a mission from God” in launching the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan and was receiving commands from the Lord.
There can be little doubt now that President Bush’s reason for launching the war in Iraq was, for him, fundamentally religious. He was driven by his belief that the attack on Saddam’s Iraq was the fulfilment of a Biblical prophesy in which he had been chosen to serve as the instrument of the Lord.
Many thousands of Americans and Iraqis have died in the campaign to defeat Gog and Magog. That the US President saw himself as the vehicle of God whose duty was to prevent the Apocalypse can only inflame suspicions across the Middle East that the United States is on a crusade against Islam. [Unquote]  I did reflect at the time of the Blair and Bush meetings that Tony Blair may have become influenced by Bush that ”Religion is a good crack” to ride on, as many influential Americans have been seen to have benefited from.
https://www.alternet.org/story/140221/bush%27s_shocking_biblical_prophecy_emerges%3A_god_wants_to_%22erase%22_mid-east_enemies_%22before_a_new_age_begins%22

(Iraq war that started in 2003 and ended in 2011 Onward to Syrian Invasion as well as the deposing of Gadhafi.)
[Quote] How America Armed Terrorists in Syria (much detail in the article plus links)
Another Middle East debacle
By GARETH PORTER • June 22, 2017

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/how-america-armed-terrorists-in-syria/

Here is a quote from Georgiaboy61: To me it serves as an insight to why Obama had the weight of the Establishment  behind him for his bid for the White House. I did say before he was elected that it was a done deal and that Hillary was just a side show, words to that effect. People were rallied for the inauguration which seemed to embody a touch of ”receiving” the saviour in how it was conducted. After the inauguration of Trump much play was made of the fact that Obama had more people attend his inauguration than at Trump’s but on checking discovered that Trump had a greater number of attendance than both Clinton and GW Bush before.

Georgiaboy61 says:
June 17, 2013 at 1:32 am
Re: “The Syrian intervention John McCain and the Clintons want would be a war for Islamism, not democracy.”

The author is entirely correct, but left out one important name – that of Barack Hussein Obama himself. True, for his own reasons, Obama seems not to be too-interested in Syria at present, but that could change at any moment.

Obama has been helping the Pan-Islamic movement – under the Muslim Brotherhood – fight its wars under the polite fiction that it is aiding the so-called “Arab Spring.” This catchphrase is nothing more than a euphemism designed to mislead the public as to the real intentions of the White House. Namely, empower the Ikhwan at every opportunity.

This Obama and his people – including HR Clinton – have already done in Libya, Egypt and in other places across Africa and the Middle East. Now, they are poised to aid the “rebels” – many of whom are members or proxies of al-Qaeda, the Muslim Brothers, or other Islamic groups.

The scandal that is Benghazi is bad-enough, but it has not yet reached a boil; that may change when people find out that the so-called consulate in that Libyan city was in fact a CIA conduit for funneling arms to the “rebels”…

This is a dirty business, and may get far-dirtier still. Obama is probably smart-enough not to get his fingerprints on any of this, but his absence does not prove his wishes are not being carried out. Hillary Clinton doesn’t make policy, she carries it out according to his wishes… [Unquote]

So much for Obama’s Nobel Prize which would have had to be applied for before he took office. He took office 12 days before the closing date for nominations and the whole process normally takes one full year.

I saw an article in GQ magazine while waiting for a haircut and also realised from observation that Obama was set to win the presidency as a certainty.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1566489/Barack-Obama-and-Dick-Cheney-are-cousins.html

[Quote] Jews are waiting for the Messiah, Christians are waiting for Jesus, and Muslims are waiting for both the Mahdi and Jesus. All religions describe them as men coming to save the world.[Unquote].

http://www.answering-islam.org/Authors/JR/Future/ch04_the_mahdi

This can only be understood in one way:

As the threat on nuclear war becomes closer to a reality based on misguided political and religious ideology, it is important to have a clear picture of how the allegorical Book of Revelation came into being.

The following content is from the True Gospel Revealed Anew by Jesus and The Celestial Spirits:
John: Book of Revelation is only a mere allegory of some one or more writers and is not the same as St. John wrote.
http://www.padgettmessages.net/messages-in-1916/1916/03/12/bible69.html

Always were these writings prophetic and held forth the promises for the future, without ever attempting to fix a time for their fulfillment, or the ending of the nation’s woes and the coming of its deliverer, so that time went on and the promises were not fulfilled, hope continued to exist and the belief of the Jews was not lessened, and non-fulfillment was explained by the further belief that the time for the consummation of their eagerly wished for expectations had not yet arrived. That God was all knowing as well as all powerful and careful for their race and that He and He alone understood just when the proper and fitting time should arrive.

This hope upon hope was a wonderful force in keeping up the beliefs and expectations of the Jews, and so effective was it that to this day they remain a nation or rather a race in belief and expectation of this coming Messiah. But, alas, as they did not recognize and accept him when he did appear, they will never again see his appearance, for he will never come as their Messiah as expected of old, but only as the great teacher and redeemer, not only of their race, but of all the peoples of the earth. He has already come as such a redeemer, and is working now to lead men to the true and only way to life and happiness and immortality. But never will any Messiah come to the Jews to establish them on earth as a great and chosen nation, as nearly all of them believe and still look for.

Thus, as I say, many books or manuscripts were written by the claimed Jewish prophets holding forth to the Jews the results of visions claimed to have been experienced by these writers. But as the prophecies, in the sense that the Jews understood them, have never been fulfilled, neither will they be fulfilled in the future, and their value has no reality.

Additionally:

http://www.padgettmessages.net/messages-in-1918/1918/03/02/jesus26.html

Many things in the Bible John says he never wrote. John was mistaken about the kind of kingdom that Jesus came to establish.

March 2nd, 1918

At some time, I will write you more fully on this matter, for I realize its importance, as many, yes a majority of the professed Christians, now believe that Jesus, at sometime, will come to earth and establish a material kingdom and rule all the nations of the earth; and some of these enthusiastic Christians believe that they will be of the elect, and become princes and sub-rulers in that kingdom, as material men called by the resurrection to again become the human, although glorified, as some of them express their faith. Well, they will be disappointed, for when they shall have passed from the mortal to the spirit, they will forever remain spirits, and the only kingdom that they will live in thereafter will be a spirit kingdom; and that, whether the kingdom of the restored man or of the Divine angel, will not be on the earth.

I must stop now. So pray to the Father and strive for a deeper and more abiding faith, and you will realize the truth and this experience. Good night.

Your brother in Christ,

John.

As a final consideration, whenever you reflect on the barbarism inflicted on the Jews of Europe during the Holocaust, remember also the present plight of the Palestinians in their ancestral homeland.

Vanessa Beeley exposing the narrative of MSM

Here is a link to Friday’s UK Column which begins with comments from Vanessa Beeley on the present situation in Syria which exposes the lies of the narrative expounded by mainstream media. This also serves to compliment my previous post and is a further counterfoil to the spirit of the Open Democracy article, and the content given by Brian Gerrish and Mike Robinson on the Macon and May meeting shows that the British government is complicit with the military ambitions of the French.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1BCov-UUPM

Opinion:  Macron wants his cake and eat it over defense

Opinion  Macron wants his cake and eat it over defense

These were the thoughts that got me out of bed this morning but realised that there would be more flesh to be added to the bone:

Macron wants his cake and eat it over defense.

The fact is that economy is intertwined with defense for it is economy which enables it. If economy is to be put at a disadvantage by design, then if France expects to use our military then they will also have to pay for that privilege.

(then France must also bear the burden and pay for the privilege of using it. We are not here to enable French adventurism in its (former) colonies, defense means defense and not aggression.)

Why are three Chinooks being sent to support French adventurism.

This is not defense, this is encroaching on the sovereignty of a distant country which is no threat to us. The French may be just protecting their own interests in a former Colony which usually means exploitation without giving anything back to the well being of the local population which should be part of their own economy.

Don’t talk about a special relationship with France in the same way that we are supposed to have it with America, if that is really a true relationship anyway.

When we were finally allowed to joint the EEC it was the French who unashamedly pre planned the decimation of our fishing industry by design on entry and this is comprehensively reported in the UKIP pdf called Stolen Seas. This is backed up by fishing societies around the country as well as the testimony of those who were responsible for maintaining ”rules” and quota’s.

Macron says that Britain cannot expect a special deal regarding Brexit but it looks like the military union aspect is a special deal for France which they want to maintain and which was signed sealed and delivered by Cameron without proper discussion in Parliament.

As the only two nuclear powers in Europe, the French want the UK to be the command centre for operations, how cynical is that? The UK would therefore be a prime target to receive a nuclear attack in response.

The UK is an obvious place being separate from the mainland of Europe and also the south westerly trade winds would blow any contamination away from Mainland Europe, skirting in a North Easterly direction.

Of course we had the Tri Scott Prime Ministership of Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and David Cameron (who is of pedigree Scottish descent) who oversaw the erosion of our independent UK military capability. These are facts that cannot be ignored and the cherry on the top is that historically the Scott’s had always supported the French in battles against the English. So as an extrapolation of that there is a possibility that they all have a clear conscience regarding their actions. ( We are talking on a political level here) Populations just get roped in to the desire of their rulers, as in Nazi Germany as a prime example.

From Nairaland Forum
[Quote] The Sahel includes some of the world’s
poorest countries but has rich natural
resources in the form of minerals and gas.
France sent troops to Mali in January 2013
after Islamist militants threatened to overrun
the capital, Bamako.[Unquote]

Weapons to this region began flooding out of Libya immediately after the death of Gadhafi in October 2011, part of the seven countries in five years strategy following the false flag of 911 and murder 3000 international citizens, resulting in ” The War On Terror”, the arrest without charge, special rendition, sometimes of innocents as well as incarceration at Guantanamo, all actions which acted as a natural recruiting sargent to activate conscientious resistance on one hand as well as criminal minds and mercenaries on the other to stir up conflict in order to enable ”justified” military response.)

From Open Democracy:
[Quote]: Conflicts are at the sharp end of contemporary crises. Refugees, extremist ideologies, criminality and predation are all produced in conflict. Contemporary conflicts are sometimes known as ‘hybrid wars’ or ‘new wars’ in which classic distinctions between public and private, government/regular and rebel/irregular, and internal and external break down. They are best understood not as legitimate contests of wills (the twentieth century idea of war) but as a degenerate social condition in which armed groups mobilise sectarian and fundamentalist sentiments and construct a predatory economy through which they enrich.Identifying ways to address violent conflict could open up strategies for dealing with broader issues. [Unquote].

Quote: “The world is not only Europe
Prior to the conflict the EU had rather extensive relations with Syria, and through the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership and the European Neighbourhood Policy was applying a range of instruments, with some limited effect, aimed at bringing about political and economic reform. These efforts were abandoned shortly after the conflict began, and instead the EU focused on the application of sanctions, scaling down its mission in Damascus, and taking extreme political measures that led to the loss of political leverage.
The Syrian foreign minister responded in June 2011 by announcing in a statement to the media, “We will forget that there is Europe on the map,” and promised to look “eastward and southward and in every direction that extends its hands to Syria. The world is not only Europe.” Indeed, shortly afterwards, Syria did suspend its membership in the Union for the Mediterranean, and it did look in other directions for support, mainly from Iran, Russia and China. This served only to increase the leverage of these countries over the Syrian government and increase polarisation at all levels. The theory of change that assumes that the regime is going to change its behaviour should such measures be imposed has not only proved to be wrong, but to the contrary, these measures produced the opposite outcome. [Unquote]

Although this is an academic paper, it must also be remembered that Syria had self suspended itself from the Union of the Mediterraean which is a French construct and just as it has been speculated that the real reason to remove Gadhafi was his intention to switch over to the gold standard as a replacement for US dollars. We can only speculate how much of an influence Assad’s new position really had in the move to depose him for regime change.

There had been an anecdotal story from a person familiar with the oil industry on a business level who told that it was Assad’s refusal to allow a pipeline to pass through Syria from Israel and on to Turkey and Europe. In his opinion,this was the real reason for the invasion of Syria and Regime change. This pipeline was to originate from Qatar.
During this conflict Syria’s industrial manufacturing capability had been looted and taken to Turkey as well as everything else destroyed by the so called friendly terrorists who receive cash support from EU, UK and USA, as well as ISIS who seemed to have free reign until Russia stepped in to make a serious attempt at eradicating them. Now the Kurds who had always made the effort to deal with ISIS in its North Eastern regions of Syria, all alone and unaided is now being portrayed as a threat to Turkey.
https://www.opendemocracy.net/can-europe-make-it/rim-turkmani/role-of-eu-in-syrian-conflict

The efficacy of cease fires as expressed in the Open Democracy article is not cut and dried:

https://shadowproof.com/2016/09/16/next-cold-war-roundup-91616/

[Quote]

_ French foreign minister Jean-Marc Ayrault said on Sep. 15 that it’s a problem that France doesn’t know all the details of the deal and the US must make more of agreement on targeting available to them because of the risk of “moderate opposition” being hit.

_ Reuters also says that France “is a key backer of rebels fighting Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s forces and allied militias.” When rebel sponsor countries are mentioned, France is not usually among those mentioned. Turkey, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia are usually cited.

_ On Friday, Sergey Lavrov said the US is “stalling on its promise to separate moderate rebel groups in Syria from terrorists. Lavrov went even further by saying he hopes “this delay is not caused by someone in Washington trying to shield terrorists from being targeted.”[Unquote]

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

[Quote]https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2018/01/18/world/u-k-choppers-join-french-counterterrorism-mission-africas-restive-sahel-region/#.WmMJiIaska8

[Quote] May said U.K.-French summit “will underline that we remain committed to defending our people and upholding our values as liberal democracies in the face of any threat, whether at home or abroad.”

One topic not high on the agenda is Brexit. Britain wants the meeting to underscore how the close relationship between the two neighbors won’t suffer when Britain leaves the EU in 2019.

In the crisply martial surroundings of Sandhurst, where army officers have been trained since the days of the British Empire, senior ministers from the two countries will sign agreements on everything from space exploration to tackling online extremism.

In a boost to Macron, Britain is throwing its backing behind the European Intervention Initiative, a multinational European military force that the French president has proposed. He also wants a common European defense budget and security doctrine.

The plan is in its early stages, but British officials don’t see it as an “EU army,” an idea on which the U.K. has long been cool. [unquote]

So here we can see that just like the nature of the EU from the beginning, matters military are now in the process of being morphed into something else again because of public reaction against the concept of an EU Army but all of the organisational structure for this is already in place, illustrated by the Command centres based in the UK now set up and ready to be put into operation.

When the final result of the Brexit vote came in, the most obvious to me was the separation of our own military from that of Europe.

It is no wonder that the French want to hook into our technical expertise for free via this so called pact, and I say this from my own observations of somebody trying to sort out the electrical problems in his French car in the centre of London and the owners comments on the matter and in that same car design they thought it a good idea to store the spare wheel in the engine compartment. I was parked next to him at Holland Park 1996.

Even on a more simple level concerning a Peugeot bicycle they thought it common sense to make a seat pillar that had a smaller diameter than standard and which was unique to their own design as well as designing the clamp so that the full weight of the rider bore upon the very bolt that is meant to clamp the saddle in place. With this design the bolt acted as the fulcrum or pivot. The first time the bolt sheared off, what was left was fortunately able to be removed and replaced with a much stronger bolt, so the mechanic told me, but it wasn’t long before that one also sheared off.

There was a time when Britain was ahead of the Americans in space technology and we willingly shared it, which resulted in nothing in return. Although we are supposed to have a special relationship with America, it came to light that when Obama visited France he told them that they were America’s greatest Ally.

France wants to impose a financial burden upon us so let them also be a recipient of that burden.

A comment on Video: JFK Truth

Soon after my article about the release of the JFK files back in October called The Release of JFK Assassination Files on this blog I began more research which led to the discovery of the testimony of Madeleine Brown who was the mistress of Vice President Johnson at the time and also the testimony of James Files who was still serving a prison sentence when by his information given confirmed the fluid relationship between the agencies of the US government and the Mafia syndicates as well as big business. James Files testimony sounds very plausible and puts into context the fragments of information which can be cross checked from different sources of origin as well as the numerous videos which have been put on line. However one had to wonder why he would claim to have fired the fatal shot that killed Kennedy, a claim made while still incarcerated.

The most prominent fact to be learned is that we will not gain much more information from mainstream media other than what has already been laid down and the obvious conclusion for this is possibly the protection of those even higher up the food chain, as it were.

I had written an outline and put it on the back burner but today came across an amazingly informative video covering first of all the identity of those involved at the highest level, quoting Madeline Brown, although bets are on that even higher up there are still individuals hidden from view.

In this video also is a mention of E Howard Hunt, as well as Gordon Liddy,  who was prominent in a book written about Watergate and who liked to show how he could withstand pain by holding the palm of his hand over a flame of a cigarette lighter. As previously mentioned none of the information within a book that I had been reading from a Jackson Mississippi library in 1985 gave away any information regarding the relationship of these actors to The Bay of Pigs, the JFK Assassination and Watergate. However there was a paperback available called The Rockerfeller File also by Gary written in same style of Who Dare Call it Conspiracy and chapter 13 is titled: Was Nixon Watergated. Also while visiting a Reagan Bush campaign office somewhere in Mississippi or possibly Louisiana, not exactly sure because of constantly moving from place to place on a daily basis, I made a comment based on what I had read from these Paperbacks and a person on my side of the counter answered back saying ‘You are right, they broke into the Watergate building several times until they were caught’.

(http://www.reformation.org/rockefeller-file.html)

James Files is not mentioned in this video so draw your own conclusions about that but would also like to mention that it is very likely that the establishment and all of its organs of influence are doing a ‘job’ on Trump because it is very likely as an outsider who wasn’t expected to win the Presidency is also, most likely not ‘one of their own’. We know that most presidential candidates of the past are pre chosen, on both sides, and have the weight of the establishment supporting them.

It is thanks to a scam item that came to my Facebook which I knew was a scam and while in the process of trying to confirm it ended up with one of their tell tale posts that refuse to delete no matter what is tried. Instead of resorting to drastic measures of resetting the phone to factory condition I decided to use Google Chrome instead which is pre installed but never use. While turning to YouTube this video, among others relevant to previous searches, was already there waiting. It is so profound and well put together that it is worth watching all the way through.

By the way, this video is not one that claims to be BANNED, as explained within this video as being used by the CIA as a red herring to convince the public that the contents are true. For some reason this display from the link for the video has appeared but is not on the original except as part of an explanation within further along.